View Poll Results:
- Voters
- 0. This poll is closed
-
0 0%
Results 1 to 10 of 20
-
10-04-2008, 12:28 AM #1
If Bush could run for another term...
Would you take him as the Republican nominee over McCain?
-
-
10-04-2008, 12:32 AM #2
No way; never!!!!
-
10-04-2008, 01:57 AM #3
McCain, he can at least put a sentence together :)
In all seriousness, I think McCain has more of a clue on foreign policy than Bush.
-
-
10-04-2008, 02:28 AM #4
What is extremely funny, is the comments so far is what I heard in 2003 with the Iraq war being at it's lowest. "Bush is an idiot!", "He sucks." Then he went on to win 50% of the vote, something Bill Clinton never did. :) I don't know how Bush is so stupid when he got more of the vote than the most popular Democrat (Clinton) and the previous Democrat (Carter). Is there actually a Democrat that got more of the vote than Bush ever???
2004 - Bush - 50.7%
1996 - Clinton - 48%
1992 - Clinton - 43%
1976 - Carter - 50.1%
You have to go back to 1964 to get a Democrat that has gotten more of the vote than an idiot!
-
10-04-2008, 02:44 AM #5
at least the others answered the question...would you choose Bush or McCain? I'd obviously take McCain...hell, I'd take Josh Brolin playing George W. over the real George W.
in all seriousness tho, Mike is right...Bush is a freakin genius...I couldn't even begin to count all the times that he gave a speech where I walked away feeling like he was anything short of brilliant....and 50% of the vote...pfft, that's incredible...absolute proof he's not an idiot
-
-
10-04-2008, 04:44 AM #6
Without allowing my emotions to control my vote, I'd much rather prefer McCain than Bush. They have similar views in Iraq, and McCain is more liberal in the economy than Bush. My vote would go to Bush.
-
10-04-2008, 05:10 AM #7
I would vote for Bush. I already voted hours ago!
-
-
10-04-2008, 05:14 AM #8
I always find it funny that after 8 years and thousands and thousands of hours of speeches people call Bush an idiot. I would like to see all those calling him an idiot not screw up 10 times as much speaking in front of millions and so much. Just look at Biden after 2 weeks!
-
10-04-2008, 08:49 AM #9
You always fail to mention that in both of Clinton's elections there was an actual third party candidate who pulled real numbers. Almost 19% in '92 and over 8% in '96. Either one of those could have given Clinton a majority.
-
10-04-2008, 11:22 AM #10
not to dig on mike, but the facts are usually only convenient for people when they help their position....he could've mentioned that, but then it wouldn't make Bush's 50% look nearly as impressive
and I apologize mike for saying you didn't answer the question...I just wanted to know who you'd pick out of the 2, but it's not like you have to tell...I'll assume the Bush is not an idiot post as a vote for him
-
Originally Posted by tnopud42 
