Results 1 to 10 of 20
-
10-08-2008, 08:21 PM #1
Kinda sad this FAKE PATCH is selling for this much
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=160289956272
With 3 days left.
-
-
10-08-2008, 09:08 PM #2
I think there was a tread about this already. Why is this card fake again? Didnt they use 2 complete jerseys in 01? Were logo shields only used as 1/1 in 01? Just curious as to why you would make an assumption of the card being fake. Im really tired of people saying things are fake with no proof. For everyone's curiosity Its not my card
-
10-08-2008, 09:19 PM #3
its fake cause its 792 of 800 or watever, theres no way a logoman would be numbered that high, most if not all logomans are 1/1's
it is very sad that someone will buy that not knowing
-
-
10-08-2008, 09:25 PM #4
No, it's real. Just like the Easter Bunny.
-
10-08-2008, 09:49 PM #5
i knew it!!!
-
-
10-08-2008, 09:52 PM #6
Ha HA, Toy, these is no possible way.
If its real im running for election
-
10-08-2008, 09:53 PM #7
although the card might be fake this is not a true statement, in the 2001 set there were nfl logos inserted into this set and they were not stamped with 1/1's. You can check out daswheels or whatever his name is santana moss collection. He has sp authentic 2001 with nfl logos that were confirmed to be real. Now yes this logo does look too good to be true since it is perfectly centered and his was not. So yes you do need to get your facts straight before making a statement like this because 1/1 nfl logos did not exist in 2001.
-
-
10-08-2008, 09:57 PM #8
ok well it still says /800 and anyone smarter that a rock would know that logomans arent numbered that high
-
10-08-2008, 09:57 PM #9
here is a picture of his santana moss from his photobucket
-
10-08-2008, 09:59 PM #10
logomans werent numbered low in 2001, there was no distinguishing numbering in the 2001 sp authentic set, this does not change the fact that the brees looks fake but you cant just say o the numbering is not right, you need better proof than that
-












