Stuckey ready to start?

[NickRadz23]

jeez, looks like someone is mad that Stuckey will be better than Young still

How about Joe Dumars getting Jason Maxiell? Amir Johnson in the second round? trading for Mike James late in the 03-04 season to help the championship run. or the big one, taking some guy named Ben Wallace for a washed up Grant Hill and Wallace later wins multiple DPOY awards.

you are the only person who must think Dumars is a bad GM

thats why its taking him so long to respond. hes still trying to find someone who thinks that Joe D is a bad GM lol

[hector234]

Stuckey is a great player, and is going to have a bright future. Is he ready to take on the starting role and lead a team? Maybe, maybe not, he doesn't have the kind of game time experience yet. With that said, I think he is a way better fit at PG than A.I. is.

[NickRadz23]

yeah AI is more of a SG then a PG.

[hector234]

so he is one of the best? he is one of the, if not, the most innactice GM in the league unless he is pressured. the things your bringing up are so long ago. what has he done recently besides the AI trade? nada.

Wow man, are you serious? Detroit is constantly one of the best teams in the east, and it's not just because of their starting five. They have had some solid bench/role players. You look at guys like Jason Maxiel and Stuckey, and tell me how he hasn't done anything recently. He constantly fills guys in to spots that fit the system. Hell, he even revived the career of Antonio McDyess, he may not put up amazing numbers, but i'll take a guy that gives you a double double over most players

[theanswer0221]

just because a team is good doesnt make the GM good. im not saying he is a terrible GM, but he isnt great. he is average. a lot of people base it on records. the bobcats, grizzlies, and t-wolves dont have terrible GMs because they have a bad record and the lakers celtics and cavs dont have the best GMs just because they have a good record. and gladdy i never said stuckey was bad if you could read i said he was good. and i still disagree with you on that. look at thads #'s compared to stuckeys this year. please dont argue with me on that no matter how you feel because i dont feel like getting into it.

joe dumars, in MY OPINION, doesnt do much besides picking in the draft. he makes no regular season or off-season moves before iverson.

end of discussion for me. you guys can tell me what an idiot i am and bash me for all i care but it s my opinion and thats yours. END OF DISCUSSION FOR DUMARS.
------

now for the real topic...if iverson were to get hurt for a few weeks, i dont think that the pistons would be nervous or struggling to find someone to replace him. stuckey has much talent, but his court vision is weak. i dont think he sees the open man enough and just throws the ball up there. that being said, he is one hell of a player and could start if necisarry, but not ready yet. give him 2 years and he could be a GREAT point guard.

[theanswer0221]

thats why its taking him so long to respond. hes still trying to find someone who thinks that Joe D is a bad GM lol

sorry that i have a life outside of SCF my man.

[Po.verse]

I think hes ready, what sucks...

Is AI will play his true spot as SG, and itll force Rip to come off the bench.

[NickRadz23]

just because a team is good doesnt make the GM good. im not saying he is a terrible GM, but he isnt great. he is average. a lot of people base it on records. the bobcats, grizzlies, and t-wolves dont have terrible GMs because they have a bad record and the lakers celtics and cavs dont have the best GMs just because they have a good record. and gladdy i never said stuckey was bad if you could read i said he was good. and i still disagree with you on that. look at thads #'s compared to stuckeys this year. please dont argue with me on that no matter how you feel because i dont feel like getting into it.

joe dumars, in MY OPINION, doesnt do much besides picking in the draft. he makes no regular season or off-season moves before iverson.

end of discussion for me. you guys can tell me what an idiot i am and bash me for all i care but it s my opinion and thats yours. END OF DISCUSSION FOR DUMARS.
------

now for the real topic...if iverson were to get hurt for a few weeks, i dont think that the pistons would be nervous or struggling to find someone to replace him. stuckey has much talent, but his court vision is weak. i dont think he sees the open man enough and just throws the ball up there. that being said, he is one hell of a player and could start if necisarry, but not ready yet. give him 2 years and he could be a GREAT point guard.

its sad that you dont have a life outside of the internet lol. thats why u have ur own website lol. and GM's are based mainly off their draft choices. And the teams record does reflect off the GM. if the GM made right trade and draft choices, then the team will do well, making their overall record improve. and im pretty sure we can argue with you all you want. if you dont want to argue dont make false accusations

[garnett_21]

the bobcats, grizzlies, and t-wolves dont have terrible GMs because they have a bad record

I beg to differ! The T-Wolves have a terrible GM regardless of their record! Ha!

As for Dumars, another good move was bringing in Flip Saunders after the Timberwolves stupidly fired him - I don't like the Pistons, but that was a good move!

Back to original topic - no, he shouldn't start yet - if AI or Rip were to be out, then yes, but not with the team that is currently in place. I don't even know if he'd be ready to take on a full-time starter role yet, even if he was the best option.

[theanswer0221]

why make a post if you cant take someone disagreeing with you? calm down buddy its just a discussion. grow up. we need to have an age limit on this site.