Results 1 to 10 of 22
-
06-10-2009, 09:21 AM #1Hockey Manager
Let's Play a Game of Spot the Difference
Card #1:
Card #2:
Seriously, what is different about these two that merits one being labelled a 1/1? It doesn't have an auto, there's no difference in colouring, there's no other discernible things that say "look I'm unique!" They look exactly the same!!!
Oooh look, I've got a 1/1 but there's 75 other copies out there THAT LOOK EXACTLY LIKE IT!!!!Last edited by RGM81; 06-10-2009 at 09:23 AM.
Habs fan and collector! Current PC's: Nick Suzuki, Cole Caufield, and Lane Hutson...., and of course...
-
-
06-10-2009, 09:23 AM #2
the lines on the top left and right edges are a different color
-
06-10-2009, 09:24 AM #3
unless it is just the scan
-
-
06-10-2009, 11:01 AM #4
the 1/1 should have been autographed.
-
06-10-2009, 11:08 AM #5
Wow I love the 1/1.
Don't realy like the other one though ???????????????????? lol
-
-
06-10-2009, 11:11 AM #6Hockey Manager
My thoughts exactly - at least with the Artifacts parallels the cards look different - their Black 1/1s often are auto'd as well (even if it's just a slapped-on sticker) - this one has no visible distinction from the /75.
I'm not particularly bitter about any of it, I've got an /75 incoming, but if I had the 1/1 I'd be wondering exactly what makes it so special.
-
06-10-2009, 11:37 AM #7
Fair point Richard lol
-
-
06-10-2009, 12:38 PM #8
Why would they even make the 1/1 for a manufactured patch? Did they shut the machine down and use extra shiny thread? Rediculous.
-
06-10-2009, 01:41 PM #9
I don't think it matters...all people will see is the "1/1". Instanly more valuable!
-
06-10-2009, 03:06 PM #10
Like Raptor mentioned, the stripes in the upper corners are darker on the 1/1.
-
Originally Posted by mortuus 
