Results 21 to 30 of 31
-
06-15-2009, 10:38 PM #21
If the Lakers think he's good enough to be on the Lakers roster, well then he's good enough to earn a ring.
-
-
06-16-2009, 12:12 AM #22
if i was him i dont know if i would want the ring, kinda embarrasing when you have to tell your grandkids, "oh yea that my ring!" "how much did you play grandpa?" "uhh not a single second.... but its still mine!"
-
06-16-2009, 01:08 AM #23
Seriously? you wouldn't want a ring?
My mom works with the Lakers doctor, and she's going to take picture with his rings. He didn't play a second and he has 3 rings already.
-
-
06-16-2009, 01:13 AM #24
Seriously? you wouldn't want a ring?
My mom works with the Lakers doctor, and she's going to take picture with his rings. He didn't play a second and he has 3 rings already.
lol nice!
-
06-16-2009, 01:49 AM #25
Seriously? you wouldn't want a ring?
My mom works with the Lakers doctor, and she's going to take picture with his rings. He didn't play a second and he has 3 rings already.
do they give rings to the guy who cleans the floors during timeouts too? :)
-
-
06-16-2009, 02:31 AM #26
Probably not, they dont sit on the bench with the team
-
06-16-2009, 11:45 AM #27
they sit on the floor next to them though!
-
-
06-17-2009, 10:33 PM #28
Thief is a little harsh - same could be said for the 11th and 12th man on every title-winning team....Scot Pollard from last year's Celtics is a perfect example. Did he do much? No...but the team he was on still won the finals...and that's all that matters...does it mean that he is a better player than Barkley or Malone, etc? Heck no...but it's just what happened.
-
06-17-2009, 10:54 PM #29
Sometimes it is better to be lucky than good.
-
06-18-2009, 07:50 PM #30
true statement there.
I think this whole finals things just goes to show that JJ Redick is still better then Morrison, even after all they've gone through. JJ actually played and scored in the finals. Adam, well, didn't.
-
Originally Posted by GriffeyJr.FAN3 
