Yet more record low temps

[OnePimpTiger]

Well OPT you have proved to me that you do not know how to evaluate what good scientific evidence is. If you can not, how can I think others can? I do have a high opinion of myself in science, not business, art, or the law. I will share what I am good at. I thought you would respect this point.

You appear to be confusing confidence with arrogance. I am confident about my stance. Prove me wrong with good evidence and I will applaud you.

And apparently you are better at evaluating scientific evidence than the climatologists who perform the studies...forgive me if I take their word over yours.

[Titantron]

man, OPT. You are one Pathetic Loser.

[mikesilvia]

Some nice headlines:

Quiet Atlantic hurricane season a boon for insurers

Thanks to El Nino, the 2009 Atlantic hurricane season has been the quietest in more than a decade, offering a reprieve for residents in the danger zone and a chance for insurance firms to refill depleted coffers.

October Cold Snap Sets 82-Year Record

October in Chicago is usually equal parts balmy T-shirt weather and nippy light jacket temperatures, but if it's felt more like winter coat weather this year, it's not your imagination.

Chicago has spent the last 17 days with below-average temperatures, and a high of a mere 47 degrees made Tuesday the coldest Oct. 13 in 82 years, CBS 2's Mary Kay Kleist says.

New Record Low in Montana

[maccards44]

Near-record temperatures expected today in Fairbanks
http://www.newsminer.com/news/2009/o...day-fairbanks/

snoozzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzz

[drtom2005]

And apparently you are better at evaluating scientific evidence than the climatologists who perform the studies...forgive me if I take their word over yours.

OPT give me repeated evidence from published non-radical climatologists that states global warming is not real. You are ignoring all the evidence and just picking faulty articles that suit your worldview. This is what I mean about your standard of evaluating scientific evidence. You give me articles that make claims with old evidence. You give me articles that make claims without translating them into real world application.

Give me multiple papers that have repeated observations disproving any one of the many pieces of evidence I have shown. You will not find it. If you do, the articles will have flaws that are easily seen if you evaluate them critically.

If you find it, I will give you praise. It is nothing personal to be disproven in science. It is even applauded.

[WantToTrade]

"The last time carbon dioxide levels were apparently as high as they are today — and were sustained at those levels — global temperatures were 5 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit higher than they are today, the sea level was approximately 75 to 120 feet higher than today, there was no permanent sea ice cap in the Arctic and very little ice on Antarctica and Greenland," said the paper's lead author, Aradhna Tripati, a UCLA assistant professor in the department of Earth and space sciences and the department of atmospheric and oceanic sciences.

I thought this was an interesting article. I wish it was a little more detailed but gives an idea of what these "liberal tax conspirators" are up to. (actually doing research, instead of just debunking)

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1008152242.htm