Results 1 to 10 of 12
-
02-17-2010, 05:50 PM #1
question about parallels
Would you classify a Glen Davis 2007-08 SP Rookie Edition #87 Auto as a parallel? He has a regular base card that is #87, and then he has the exact same card exact it has an auto. Would this be classified as an parallel?
thanks,
brady
-
-
02-17-2010, 05:55 PM #2
Same photo same everything, I'd say yes.
-
02-17-2010, 05:59 PM #3
ok, so u would say it is a parallel???
-
-
02-17-2010, 06:03 PM #4
-
02-17-2010, 06:06 PM #5
lol easy big guy...u didn't have to reply...but thanks for replying the first time...i appreciate ur input
Last edited by twinsfan48; 02-17-2010 at 06:13 PM. Reason: forgot somethin
-
-
02-17-2010, 06:16 PM #6
Not sure what kind of game you are playing here...
You started a thread asking for an opinion or answer.
I answered and in turn you ask me the same question again?
-
02-17-2010, 06:30 PM #7
none man, thanks for the reply
-
-
02-17-2010, 07:45 PM #8
If it´s the exact same card with one small change (color, some logo or in this case an auto), then that´s the definition of a parallel in my opinion.
-
02-17-2010, 09:55 PM #9
I have both the RC and Auto in my PC... I would NOT call this a parallel, because it's simply the Auto version in the set of RC's. A parallel to me is some version of a card that is numbered, colored, or something else different with the card.
hope this helps..
-
02-17-2010, 09:58 PM #10
Wouldn´t an auto count as "something else different with the card"?
-
Originally Posted by MatthewLee 
