Results 41 to 50 of 51
-
07-02-2003, 08:11 PM #41
Cardking, I'll pass, thanks.
Vic
-
-
07-02-2003, 08:13 PM #42
-2002 Upper Deck SP Authentic Michael Vick Sign of the Times Autograph BV $100.00***
-2000 Upper Deck MVP Chad Pennington Pro Sign Autograph BV $60.00***
-1999 Upper Deck SP Signature Ed. Jason Taylor Autograph BV $30.00***
-2002 Playoff Prime Signatures Ricky Williams Autograph seq. #ed 081/116 BV $80.00***
-2002 Playoff Prime Signatures LaDainian Tomlinson Autograph seq. #ed 19/59 BV $60.00***
-2002 Playoff Prime Signatures Deuce McAllister Autograph seq. #ed 101/113 BV $40.00***
-2002 Playoff Prime Signatures Drew Brees Autograph seq. #ed 46/57 BV $40.00***
-2002 Playoff Prime Signatures Brian Griese Autograph seq. #ed 70/81 BV $40.00***
those are the cards were interested in
-
07-02-2003, 08:54 PM #43
i dont have scans of those two, why?
-
-
07-02-2003, 09:14 PM #44
jandj, I might trade the Griese auto, but not the others. I like a few of your Chambers autos, but not sure which ones you would be willing to trade for the Griese auto...LMK.
Shockers,
just curious as to what the other Montana looks like (chiefs or 49ers?) and i liked your Dillon...so thought was keeping my options open to trade either for the one Montana auto as agreed upon, or maybe for the other Montana and Dillon autos.
Vic
-
07-02-2003, 10:17 PM #45
ok nvm then the greise was really the card i wanted the least
-
-
07-03-2003, 01:36 AM #46
other montana is 49ers as well, i would prefer to trade it along with the dillon if that is something you want to do.
-
07-03-2003, 01:58 AM #47
Is there any way you can get a friend to take a picture or scan of those cards? I mean, I'll do that trade instead since I get two cards, but I need to know what the cards/autos look like first. Main reason is condition of the cards and how clean/bold the autos are.
LMK,
Vic
-
-
07-04-2003, 12:11 AM #48
i wouldnt trade them if the condition of the card, was not good. the dillon looks good, as for the montana, i dont have it yet. will let you know when i do, though. lmk
-
07-04-2003, 01:12 AM #49
Sounds good, lmk when you get the Montana(s).
Vic
-
07-06-2003, 12:40 AM #50BANNED
cmon where are the naked ladies?
-
