Results 311 to 320 of 787
-
04-28-2011, 11:57 AM #311
Dude, the skulls it shows on the right says right underneath it... It says prehistoric humans. So since Im not a paleontologist and you gave me a site that your certain is correct, I was assuming it was human.
Im talking about fossils that show a full body of a person whose in the evolution stages that they apparently underwent i.e. curved back or something. Showing me just a skull that looks like a humans doesn't show me evolution.
-
-
04-28-2011, 12:00 PM #312
Transparent, so everyone should know everything about everything then in fact making humans like God? We don't know everything because we aren't God, hence the reason we believe in him.
That website is reputable, Carbon Dating isn't. So your telling me a 70 million year old fossil had blood vessels and cells in it?
-
04-28-2011, 12:02 PM #313
Okay, can you point out the skull that most resembles Adam and his children on that site?
-
-
04-28-2011, 12:05 PM #314
So where in the article is the part that they start questioning Carbon Dating and the "obvious" new age for the fossil? I must have missed that part. And no, I am not telling you that. The reputable website IS.Last edited by habsheaven; 04-28-2011 at 12:06 PM. Reason: added comment
-
04-28-2011, 12:10 PM #315
Like I just said in my previous post, Im no Paleontologists so I can't say. But if it says its a human skull, on a site you told me to look at, I was guessing it was.
They didn't question it, but there always has been questions about carbon dating. The website got its information from the study that happened, it wasn't like NG went and did the testing. But the fact remains your not answering the simple question that I have been asking: How can blood cells and all still be in a 70 million year old fossil?
-
-
04-28-2011, 12:12 PM #316
I am just looking for your "best guess" on those questions. Have you never considered the logistics of it? If not, give it a shot.
-
04-28-2011, 12:17 PM #317
So basically you want me to give my limited researched opinion on subjects that I haven't really worked on, so you can reject my idea and claim that another Christian is talking about stuff he doesn't know about? Look back a couple pages and youll see people talking about that. Im comfortable enough to say I dont know sometimes.
-
-
04-28-2011, 12:17 PM #318
Since God is all-powerful, he could have teleported them for all we know. Based on the assumption of God's omnipotence, any answer would be plausible, so does it really matter how they got there or who got sent where?
-
04-28-2011, 12:20 PM #319
I believe it says they are prehistoric human skulls. My mistake, I thought that was what you meant by half human/half animal. As soon as they find one with antlers I will let you know.
Guess what? Just as you are not a Paleontologist, I am not a scientist. So why are you expecting me to answer that question? I can offer this though. What are your thoughts on the T-rex's age? How old is too old for there to be "soft tissue"? What exactly was the point of posting the website? Are you telling me 6,000 years is not too old and T-Rex must have been hanging out with Adam in the Garden of Eden?Last edited by habsheaven; 04-28-2011 at 12:21 PM. Reason: typo
-
04-28-2011, 12:24 PM #320
It matters because it "makes no sense".
So he could have just "wiggled" his nose and they all just went "poof" welcome to your new digs!!
-













