Trade: Cavaliers acquire Jamison

[nadeau01_johnson48]

Now I know I should have been looking for Jaminson instead of Areanas. Hope they do well, esp, if they play the Lakers. Jaminson has always been under rated. He was the true leader of the Wizzards.
Good job Cavs.
You may win a Championship
You may still lose Lebron

LeBron isn't going anywhere.

[cp3fan18261]

I don't want to start a Lakers-Cavaliers argument, but how can some of you say that the Lakers are clearly better than the Cavs? I mean, the Cavs beat the Lakers twice, and one of those times they did not have their second best player. I'm not saying the Cavs are better than the Lakers, but I don't think anyone can say that the Lakers are the clear cut better team.

Your right, but just because the Lakers lost to the Cavs twice doesn't have anything to do with the playoffs, Lakers have the history, you can't say Cavs are better, the Cavs don't have the history.

[nadeau01_johnson48]

Your right, but just because the Lakers lost to the Cavs twice doesn't have anything to do with the playoffs, Lakers have the history, you can't say Cavs are better, the Cavs don't have the history.

History has no impact on current things. You're right you can't say the Cavs are better, but you also can't say the Lakers are better simply off of history.

[poppudaimadochi]

LeBron isn't going anywhere.

exactly, they just showed him they are ready to put a real team around him and not expect him to do it all by himself anymore...

all they need is a real center now, or is O'Neal enough to deal with Howard on the way to the Finals ?

[cp3fan18261]

History has no impact on current things. You're right you can't say the Cavs are better, but you also can't say the Lakers are better simply off of history.

Right, but the playoffs statement was correct. Listen, if I were to pick a more complete team, I would say the Lakers, they have more depth, I think the Cavs might have some problems with their lineups, they got a lot of big men, so its going to be hard putting them into lineups.

[JesRey]

Your right, but just because the Lakers lost to the Cavs twice doesn't have anything to do with the playoffs, Lakers have the history, you can't say Cavs are better, the Cavs don't have the history.

This is 2010 not the past...

Well i certainly dont live in the past. We wont know who the better team is unless they matchup in the Finals.

Good thing is both games are out of the way already

[justinhixson]

exactly, they just showed him they are ready to put a real team around him and not expect him to do it all by himself anymore...

all they need is a real center now, or is O'Neal enough to deal with Howard on the way to the Finals ?

Shaq/Andy will get Howard in foul trouble; they will be just fine against the Magic.

[Reggie_Miller]

LeBron isn't going anywhere.

Keep thinking that! HA!

Don't look now, but the L.A. Clippers just go enough cap space to get him, so the Cavs might have just helped LAC in doing so!! LOL

[cp3fan18261]

This is 2010 not the past...

Well i certainly dont live in the past. We wont know who the better team is unless they matchup in the Finals.

Good thing is both games are out of the way already

Yeah, that was a bad statement, but, the Cavs will have to play well in the playoffs, the Magic or Hawks or even Celtics, or even a suprize eastern conference team could be the Cavs, or a Western conference could beat the Lakers, we will see.

[nadeau01_johnson48]

Keep thinking that! HA!

Don't look now, but the L.A. Clippers just go enough cap space to get him, so the Cavs might have just helped LAC in doing so!! LOL

Yes, because LeBron will leave a bonafide championship contender to go play for a mediocre-at-best team. He's not going anywhere. Quote me.