Results 11 to 20 of 27
-
07-09-2010, 05:36 PM #11BANNED
4 Millions was what he wanted....but my guess is Flyers will pay him 3
-
-
07-09-2010, 05:56 PM #12
I like the signing. He adds a dimension that they Flyers lacked...skill.
-
07-09-2010, 06:15 PM #13
He's skilled while the rest of the Flyers are not? A more finesse type of player yes. But he is no Richards, Carter, or Briere
He's also soft, not a grinder, and not tough.
These were all things the Flyers were missing in their Players last year too. I wonder why?PC Players: Hidden Content , Hidden Content , Hidden Content , Hidden Content & Hidden Content
Trader Flickr: Hidden Content
-
-
07-09-2010, 11:27 PM #14
signed for $2 million, puts us over by about a million and a half, but we should be getting rid of cote's salary which will bring it under a million
-
07-10-2010, 12:19 PM #15
I would guess a team that is in the back of the order would take the trade option if they feel he would be taken by a team ranked higher in the waiver order....
-
-
07-10-2010, 01:38 PM #16
A team in the back of the order probably has to clear cap space before they could take him which means trading rather than picking him up off waivers (if it comes to that) Unless the other teams are willing to trade prospects and draft picks Philly is still in the same trouble it was in before moving him. Remember they are only considering moving him because of cap troubles.Last edited by mikecole141; 07-10-2010 at 03:06 PM.
-
07-10-2010, 01:47 PM #17
I agree - that would be if any of the team in the mid to late order has cap space....As example - If the Kings wanted him, he would have to be passed by by 17 teams (not positive on exact order#) - so if the Kings wanted him and had the cap space and felt he would be picked up before they got their turn, they would want to trade a pic for him...
Thats all I was trying to point out...
-
-
07-10-2010, 03:08 PM #18
That is what Philly is counting on. As he hasn't gone on waivers yet.
Does anybody know if he has a no Trade Clause only, or is it a No Trade, No movement claus? If it is the second, they can't even put him on waivers.
-
07-12-2010, 12:14 AM #19
To even think that Gagne will be put on waivers is just silly. He still has value in the league and i see him getting traded to LA or CBJ once the whole Kovalchuk issue gets sorted out. Its not the like guy is Sheldon Souray or Something....he is a 30+ goal scorer that alot of teams need badly.
-
07-12-2010, 01:09 AM #20Assistant General Manager
If they picked him up for 2 mil it a good deal imo. I still not see anyone post the contract though.
D
on
-
Originally Posted by kovyheater 
