Are these RCs or not???

[HammerHawks]

2003-04 Titanium RC Year players that don't have RCs /99 have JSY cards numbered to their JSY number. In my opinion...they would be RCs. For example, the Vermette /20, Bergeron /37, Higgins /88, Tootoo /55, etc.

I know, the definition says it has to /99 or higher, I know.

I guess the Private Stock RCs from 01-02 would be under the same catagory...Kovy /17, Conklin /1, etc.

To me, these are the players first cards in the set in their rookie year. They are not parallels, inserts, or show cards. To me, they are RCs, no matter how rare they are.

What do you guys THINK?

[qualum23]

I believe that they are rookie cards as well. No matter how rare they really are, they are still listed under the heading of 2003-04 Titanium. They are not listed under a subset, such as parallel this or numbered that. They are rookies, in my opinion. They are part of the base set.

[somawilt]

I personally believe that as long as it's part of the base set, it's a RC. Numbering should be a non-issue. The /99 designation is silly.

[HammerHawks]

Thanks guys, anyone else?

[habscards]

I kinda remember, someone correct me if I am wrong but the year after all the rookies were numbered out of their jersey number the designation of 99 as the lowest numbered rookie card was implemented.

[HammerHawks]

I kinda remember, someone correct me if I am wrong but the year after all the rookies were numbered out of their jersey number the designation of 99 as the lowest numbered rookie card was implemented.

Hmm, that makes sense. Can anyone confirm this?