Results 21 to 22 of 22
-
02-04-2011, 12:33 AM #21
Again, show me the legislation showing they can't do this. I asked you that last time, and you didn't show it to me, because you can't. You are wrong, plain and simple. Again, you like using large letters, so I will do it for you again:
SHOW ME THE LEGISLATION THAT SAYS SCOREBOARD COULDN'T USE AUTOGRAPHED CARDS OF OTHER COMPANIES CARDS IN THEIR PRODUCTS. C'MON, SHOW ME. IF IT JUST REEKS OF A LAWSUIT, SHOW ME WHICH LAW IT BREAKS. THIS IS THE SIMPLE WAY FOR YOU TO PROVE THIS - SHOW ME THE LAW THIS BREAKS.
Do you even know what the autographed "buy-back" cards were? They weren't cards that were previously autographed and certified by Topps/Upper Deck etc. They were unautographed Topps/Pacifc/Skybox/Upper Deck etc cards purchased by Scoreboard, as well as some unautographed classic/scoreboard cards, some of which were inserted in unautographed, and some of which were autographed by players, stamped as authentic by Scoreboard and inserted in packs. It therefore isn't Upper Deck/Topps etc who is certifying the autograph, so there is no onus on them, it was Scoreboard via their authentication stamp.
I am a lawyer and have more knowledge in my little finger than you have in your entire body. It is you who doesn't have a clue - and you wouldn't even if I gave you a C, L, U and E.
As for the Staubach, Proline was later produced by Classic, which was then purchased by Scoreboard, so 1997 Proline was produced by Scoreboard. Scoreboard were the organisation that took over producing Proline - shows how little you know about cards. Then again you do have a IQ in the low double "digets". Go back to playing the banjo on the porch "g'buddy".
-
-
02-04-2011, 12:49 AM #22

This thread will be closed.
Hidden Content
My Photobucket:
-












