Results 11 to 16 of 16
-
01-30-2011, 10:32 PM #11
I will put it this way. Should I see a sticker autograph card from the same year of a player as an on card autograph I would buy the on card autograph everytime! I am sure that card companies must understand that by now and still they make these silly sticker cards that in my mind are not really autographed cards. They are autographed stickers thrown on cards. Yet they still advertise these as autographed cards? I seriously do not care to see redemptions or sticker autos in my packs. They should only insert cards that have been signed instead of taking advantage of what seems to be a shrinking market of buyers. Stickers and redemptions are this generations attack by the makers that the 1980's overproduction was!
-
-
01-31-2011, 06:59 PM #12
I am sure I am in the minority but, I prefer them.
I like to see the autograph. I would rather have a huge silver sticker where I could see the autograph as opposed to a card where the auto blends in to the card. I am fine with a hard signed card if there is a designed area to be signed but if not I would rather have a sticker.
-
01-31-2011, 11:02 PM #13
First person that I have seen that found a positive for foil sticker autos!
-
-
01-31-2011, 11:04 PM #14
I have never actually seen a card with an auto on a sticker in person....
-
02-01-2011, 08:44 PM #15
I prefer the sticker too...as a Raider fan I've seen several cards that are signed in Black sharpie over the black raiders jersey and you miss half the auto...much prefer the stickers.
-
-
02-01-2011, 08:59 PM #16
My final take: I actually think they look decent on most lower-end cards, but i dont think they should put them on higher end cards. Some cards with sticker autos just dont look right, while some card designs make them look nice....
-
Originally Posted by bigga 
