Results 11 to 20 of 29
-
03-14-2011, 12:14 AM #11
Oh ok, so then it must state rookie on the front to be called a rookie card?
-
-
03-14-2011, 12:27 AM #12
I don't have an issue with your entry. I think that is a very cool card. I am just saying that I see where Hairy is coming from. You have a card from a rookie year that has a patch and 2 autos but it is not a true Rookie Patch Auto.
The contest is for rookie auto patches. Usually Vince Carter makes specific notes but I think this is the loose version otherwise he would have said so.
Lets keep these contests fun this year please. Its all for fun.
-
03-14-2011, 12:29 AM #13
Ok thanks, lets see what Vince says
-
-
03-14-2011, 12:53 AM #14
-
03-14-2011, 04:15 AM #15
Hey dude, should I give up yet? The winner is already decided. Ha ha ha.
Up to Vince but I think this theme means real rc card (with patch and auto) too.Last edited by airnoname; 03-14-2011 at 04:18 AM.
-
-
03-15-2011, 02:41 AM #16
Tristan-yes that is a insert patch Auto.. must be a true Rookie Patch Auto.. the Beasley wont count
-
03-15-2011, 02:43 AM #17
Oh ok, I will submit another one. Thanks for clearing that up
-
-
03-15-2011, 11:10 AM #18
I wonder if this card illegible?
Basically, the Exquisire RC Patch auto (same design with 03-04) but this card was issued in 09-10 Exquisite. as RC Patch Flashback so it should considered as an insert. Right?
Card is not mine anyway.
-
03-15-2011, 06:52 PM #19
I wonder if this card illegible?
Basically, the Exquisire RC Patch auto (same design with 03-04) but this card was issued in 09-10 Exquisite. as RC Patch Flashback so it should considered as an insert. Right?
Card is not mine anyway.
no that wont count...
-
03-15-2011, 11:10 PM #20
When I saw that Rose, I gave up and didn't bother entering ha ha, no way any of my cards can win against that.
-
Originally Posted by tristan20 
