Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1






    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,881
    SCF Rewards
    28,122
    Country
    Cleveland Indians Pittsburgh Penguins Boise State Broncos
    Twitter: @DFWGrapher Instagram:

    Topps Countdown; #60: 1995 Topps

    60 Years of Topps Baseball Countdown

    #60: 1995 Topps
    by Drew Pelto, AKA *censored*

    Unless you're an Atlanta Braves fan, 1995 was likely a forgettable year of baseball. Each team lost 18 games from the schedule due to a strike that, when all was said and done at its end, only proceeded to screw over the fans and small market teams. I have a late April birthday. Opening Day should not come after it. It was the first year in 90 that didn't have a defending World Series champion from the previous year. Albert JoJuan Belle was screwed out of the AL MVP award by a bitter media.

    And Topps released this disaster of a set. And I mean disaster. Seriously, I can find no redeeming value in it, aside from a card celebrating what would have been Babe Ruth’s 100th birthday.

    You would think that following the strike, Topps would get it in gear and release some kind of epic set that welcomed baseball back from its self-imposed hiatus. Instead, it seemed more like they were preparing to have a set filled with truck drivers from Iowa who won the Cy Young Award or construction workers from North Dakota who led the league with an astonishing 21 homers. The design was a poor attempt at being edgy, with borders mimicking ripped edges and a font that just screamed Hot Topic faux-punk.



    I feel like these cards should have bright red mohawks and leather jackets

    The player selection left much to be desired. Of course, it's the mid 90's, a time after Nolan and before A-Rod, where the star rookies were minimal and future Hall of Famers were making themselves into could-have-been Hall of Famers with various creams, clears, drops, pills, powders, injections, voodoo, witch doctors, rain dances, and other performance enhancers that weren't good and wholesome and safe for an America that still believed it was in the 1950‘s. It was another one of those years before Barry Bonds' head grew, before Ken Griffey Jr.'s body fell apart on him, when Mark McGwire was just an injury-prone power hitter who could barely hit his weight despite mashing balls 450 feet, and when Matt Williams was going to hit 62 and Tony Gwynn would surpass .400.

    Speaking of those latter stats, Topps continued the parallel mania, but instead of Topps Gold, it was... CyberStats. With the strike-ended 1994 season, Topps simulated the rest of the season on some high-tech computer (probably something similar to the laptop I bought 8 years ago-- which would have been amazingly advanced for 1994, but is now a giant pile of crap) and came up with stats for the remainder of the season. They then put them on cards and inserted them one per pack. For the record, Matt Williams hit 62, Barry Bonds hit a possibly-non-steroid-influenced 61, and Gwynn hit .420. Somehow the White Sox won the World Series over the Reds, with the two inexplicably getting past the Yankees and Expos. The CyberStats cards were hard to tell apart from the regular set cards by looking at the front. The background of the photo had some sort of dark foil thing done with it, so it just made us wonder if the photographer snapped the photo just as the stadium was undergoing a brownout.



    L to R: Regular, CyberStats front, Cyberstats back.

    1995 was also part of the doldrums of the Bowman Effect, a term you will be seeing a lot in this series. Topps of course brought back Bowman in 1989, hitting its apex with the post-1992 Bowman sets. Sharp photography, semi-premium packaging, and the kicker-- massive ungodly amounts of rookie cards. This was great for Topps as a business, but terrible for the Topps set itself. By putting in loads of rookies into earlier sets, by the time they made their actual major league debuts, their Topps card was no longer their rookie card but just another piece of cardboard with that player's name on it. 1995 should have been a decent year for them-- Garrett Anderson, Andy Pettitte, Shawn Green, Hideo Nomo, Chipper Jones, Brad Radke, Troy Percival, and Marty Cordova all were in the Rookie of the Year voting. But Anderson, Pettitte, Cordova, and Percival all had their rookies in Bowman sets. The lone notable rookie cards in 1995 Topps: Rey Ordonez, Jay Payton, Terrence Long, and Aaron Boone. They did at least get Nomo and Radke in the Traded set, while Green and Jones had theirs as draft picks in previous Topps sets, so you can't fault them on those two.

    And thus, with a lame crop of rookies, a poor design, and really bad timing to release a total stinker of a set, 1995 Topps gets the pick as the worst Topps baseball base set of all-time. For all the great sets Topps has ever made, you’re bound to find a few bad ones in the bunch. No one bats 1.000 for a career.

    About the Author: Drew Pelto hit .100 in the Painesville, Ohio Little League in 1995 as a catcher, middle infielder, and corner outfielder for the 2-16 Kent Marks Home Improvement Cardinals. He currently lives in Texas with his wife and a herd of cats.
    Last edited by *censored*; 05-06-2011 at 12:23 AM.

  2. #2






    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Age
    44
    Posts
    25,355
    SCF Rewards
    36,527
    Blog Entries
    35
    Country
    Montreal Canadiens Toronto Blue Jays New England Patriots
    Twitter: @KarineHains See Pheebs8882's Items on eBay

    Posted article here: https://www.sportscardforum.com/artic...60-1995-topps/

    Great stuff Drew, keep them coming!

  3. #3





    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,525
    SCF Rewards
    400
    Country
    See no page's Items on eBay

    Okay, i said i would give my honest comments about each set. Again, i look at design only, not player selection, rookies, special cards, etc. This is strictly comments on set design.

    I happen to like this design. I like the ragged edges that make the cards look different from the average card, i like the way the name is printed (both color and font), and if you look at the cards you posted you can see that they had some real good action shots with excellant quality printing. I like this set design, just shows how different people have different opinions and likes, as you hate the edges and fonts and i love them. Of course there is no right or wrong since its all opinions, and its great to see what different people think. I hope we get a lot of people commenting here.

    Good job on your article, this is a lot of work i know, and while its something i would love to do myself, i wouldnt have the patience to do the in-depth review that you are doing, you are really doing this the right way, thanks bud.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Follow SCF on