Results 11 to 19 of 19
-
06-07-2011, 10:05 PM #11
As for Romney, I met the guy during the last election campaign. I felt the need to shower afterwards. Not my type of person. A little too polished and prepped.
As for the Tea Party, I think Mike is spot-on. The last thing the Tea Party wants to be remembered for is splitting the conservative vote and getting Public Enemy #1 another four years to spend the country into oblivion. Right now the Tea Party is in survival mode. They have no legit candidate so they are doing the second best thing and doing the whole "enemy of my enemy" thing. Not what the Dems had hoped for, I am sure.
-
-
06-08-2011, 04:12 PM #12
Truth be told, I guess most would rather stomach Romney then having another 4 years of Obama.
-
06-09-2011, 09:32 PM #13
Anybody but Obama , Heck anyone that has posted in this thread could do a better job than the Moron in chief .... I am all in for Herman Cain !
-
-
06-09-2011, 10:08 PM #14
+1. I do like what I've read/heard from Cain as well. Too bad I don't think he'll have a chance. He could give Obama alot of problems though.
-
06-12-2011, 09:43 AM #15
I wouldn't count Cain out just yet , He is polling very high beating Romney in a few and ahead of Pawlenty in a few . He has momentum going . We just have to worry about the Republican big wigs who will give us Romney in the end no matter what the people think. Imagine that Repubs. going against the will of the people just like the Dems.We don't need anymore politicians we need leaders , And Herman is the man !
-
-
06-16-2011, 10:29 AM #16
I actually hope that Herman Cain gets the republican nomination. He's a joke and Obama will crush him.
Drug and smoke free trading.
Hidden Content
Hidden Content cardscomicsmoviesandgames
Hidden Content darkdemon202404
-
06-16-2011, 10:24 PM #17
Peter Pan can beat this Obama fellow ....
-
-
06-17-2011, 07:25 AM #18
Peter Pan can beat this Obama fellow ....
And daffy duck can beat any republican canidate.
-
06-18-2011, 09:39 PM #19
I see the two as near mirror images of each other. Both are willing to say/do anything to be in office, both are/were relative unknowns prior to the 2008 election, both have a slick polished appearance that does not feel authentic...I would be open to option #3, four years with no president.
I know, most people will say "What?!! No president?!!" Let's be honest, the president is largely a figure-head. We haven't had a president that was the true leader and chief of his party since Reagan. There was a time when presidents defined their country, had character that withstood the withering assault of the opposition, were looked upon by the world as someone to listen to when he spoke...
Those days are gone. What we get now is fluff. We get some Ivy League trained powder-puff that is about as manly as my 9 year-old son. What we get is some weak-kneed puppet that doesn't even know what he stands for much less what his party stands for. What we get is some semblance of a leader that, when faced with adversity or great challenge...he blinks...he hesitates...he debates...he seeks the advice of his spin doctors, and then, and only then, he makes the best decision that benefits himself and his party's chances of retaining power.
Great presidents are a thing of the past. If you want to see a great president then look in your wallet.
-
Originally Posted by duane1969 
