Results 1 to 10 of 13
-
08-03-2011, 08:00 PM #1
2010/11 Panini Contenders or 10/11 Artifacts
which of the two would you rather buy?
thx
-
-
08-03-2011, 08:41 PM #2Hockey Manager
Contenders - hard-signed rookie autos that hold much better value than the dull /999 Artifacts RCs.
Habs fan and collector! Current PC's: Nick Suzuki, Cole Caufield, and Lane Hutson...., and of course...
-
08-03-2011, 08:51 PM #3
Contenders
I believe there should still be some golden tickets still un-redeem out there...
-
-
08-03-2011, 08:52 PM #4
Contenders don't have a lot of value except for the big names though...
Artifacts is usually fun to open, a hit in every pack, chances to get really nice hits too....
I bought about a case worth of both, and liked to bust Artifacts more than Contenders, but maybe that's just me.
-
08-03-2011, 09:33 PM #5
I like Contenders in small doses, like 1 box. The lure of a golden ticket is nice, but the reality is if you crack a case you may end up with a half dozen Philip McRae autos.
-
-
08-03-2011, 09:38 PM #6
depends
Autos are better in Contenders as they are RC's but there are no GU cards in it.
-
08-03-2011, 09:52 PM #7
artifacts more fun hit per pack awsome
Flickr: Hidden Content
Looking for Penguins, HOF Autos, Vintage Memorabilia. Aswell as any Guentzel and Murray Rookie Autos, Top Player Autos and Always looking for Decent Young Guns
-
-
08-04-2011, 01:28 AM #8
I'd say artifacts. Contenders has nice rookie auto's but they aren't that frequent(the big ones). I went away from artifacts this year and now wish I hadn't. I did buy a lot of Limited this year and loved it! But of the 2 you listed, I would do artifacts, Brad.
-
08-04-2011, 01:43 AM #9
I'd say save your money and buy a fishing rod. Better returns and much longer fun for value ratio.
-
08-04-2011, 07:30 AM #10
There's nothing better than a hard signed auto of a great player. Contenders all the way
-
