Results 21 to 27 of 27
-
01-04-2012, 11:01 AM #21
I agree with your statement about fiscal responsibility. Republicans typically are no more fiscal responsible than any other typical politicians. They just want to spend the money on their own pet projects.
-
-
01-04-2012, 11:04 AM #22
Just about all of the republican candidates are fiscal conservatives. Gary Johnson didn't get any traction because he is looked at as a nut, probably because of the pot thing.
-
01-04-2012, 11:10 AM #23

That's dumb. Johnson says he would "re-evaluate" the war on drugs. Which makes total sense to me. Our prison population is astronomical, thanks in large part to said "war". How legalizing pot makes Gary Johnson a "nut" in the eyes of Republicans shows me exactly illogical some of the Republican base is.
-
-
01-04-2012, 11:13 AM #24
There are logical arguments to be made for not legalizing it. It's an issue that two reasonable people can genuinely disagree on. I think we should end the drug war.
-
01-04-2012, 11:20 AM #25

I agree with that totally. But why disregard him over it? Johnson has some major fiscal conservative street cred. Is it because it violates conservative family values? So does Newt Gingrich's entire existence. I just don't get it. If it were Gary Johnson running against Mr. O, I'd pull that lever for Johnson pretty quickly.
-
-
01-04-2012, 11:27 AM #26
I think the importance of conservative family values spoke pretty loudly last night in Iowa.
-
01-04-2012, 11:57 AM #27

It's Iowa. Of course they did. But several of the players during the Republican campaign this past year had issues with racism and sexual deviance. My point is that when Johnson was still in the Republican hunt, and seemingly ignored for his stance on pot, why were other candidates with legitimate character issues leapfrogging each other for the #1 spot?
-












