Hall vs Seguin

[gardzy99]

+/- is a meaningless stat and he has been great during the regular season at times but inconsistent.

I don't believe it's a meaningless stat.....if you're a liability to your team this number will show it. If you're an asset this number will show that as well.....

I believe Seguin is going to be the better player. He has started out a winner and has had great leaders around him (I hope he took a lesson or two from Mark Recchi). He is much better on the defensive side of the puck than Hall. I don't think Hall is a physical player....or I don't think he should be. He should float around the offensive zone and try to get his wicked shot off.....if he continues to try to be too physical it's going to limit him due to injuries. Seguin is a playmaker and he knows it.

Seguin seems more level-headed and has a complete understanding of the game already. I think this pushes him ahead of Hall dramatically. Hall is still learning the game and I honestly do not think he has the proper teachers in Edmonton.......

Seguin for me.

[Habitforming]

+/- is a meaningless stat and he has been great during the regular season at times but inconsistent.

+/- is a major stat that isn't inflated like so many other stats are. How many times have you seen a player get an assist and not even be on the ice when the goal was scored?

+/- is THE main stat a coach looks for when scouting players and deciding line matching.

Seguin for me. I'd always take a complete player ala Yzerman over a one trick pony ala Hull/ Bossy

[OBOMBA]

+/- is a major stat that isn't inflated like so many other stats are. How many times have you seen a player get an assist and not even be on the ice when the goal was scored?

+/- is THE main stat a coach looks for when scouting players and deciding line matching.

Seguin for me. I'd always take a complete player ala Yzerman over a one trick pony ala Hull/ Bossy

jeff schultz was a +50 in 10 so i guess hes bobby orr