Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 41
  1. #21




    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,979
    SCF Rewards
    1,033
    Country
    See j80rice's Items on eBay

    So you are saying that because the Dems did it, the Republicans can do it too. That makes it right??

    no, we are saying we are sick of the double standards. When bush did something, people were up in arms, but if obama does it, it's ok because he has to.

    if democrats did something to bush it was ok, but if republicans do it to obama they are wrong.

  2. #22




    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,979
    SCF Rewards
    1,033
    Country
    See j80rice's Items on eBay

    Blah Blah Blah. No one said he gets a free pass. In this instance he is doing what has to be done. Are you denying that the Republicans were going to block these appointments?

    have you bothered to read through your comments for the past, oh I don't know, year. Trust me, it appears as though you have given him a free pass and a blank check. Everything questionable he has done you have defended.

  3. #23







    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    56
    Posts
    19,098
    SCF Rewards
    1,943
    Blog Entries
    6
    Country

    So you are saying that because the Dems did it, the Republicans can do it too. That makes it right??

    I saying that criticizing Republicans for doing it now when Dems did it then is no more right than giving Obama a free pass now because Bush did something then.

    Added bonus is Obama saying that things would be different when he was president and that has been a lie.

  4. #24





    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    9,094
    SCF Rewards
    1,158
    Country
    See spaz4's Items on eBay

    This thread is giving me a headache. Can't we all just agree at this point that each party tries to keep the other party from going forth with their agenda?

  5. #25







    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    56
    Posts
    19,098
    SCF Rewards
    1,943
    Blog Entries
    6
    Country

    This thread is giving me a headache. Can't we all just agree at this point that each party tries to keep the other party from going forth with their agenda?

    Agreed.

  6. #26




    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Age
    60
    Posts
    7,903
    SCF Rewards
    7,333
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (205)
    Country
    See habsheaven's Items on eBay

    I saying that criticizing Republicans for doing it now when Dems did it then is no more right than giving Obama a free pass now because Bush did something then.

    Added bonus is Obama saying that things would be different when he was president and that has been a lie.

    I was not criticizing Republicans for doing it. I was explaining why Obama did it. And Obama did not lie about changing things when he became President. A lie is something said that you know to be untrue at the time you say it. If anything, he was naive to think he could change the unchangeable.

  7. #27




    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    15,120
    SCF Rewards
    361
    Country
    See bbra9027's Items on eBay

    This thread is giving me a headache. Can't we all just agree at this point that each party tries to keep the other party from going forth with their agenda?


    George Washington actually warned us against forming political parties. I wonder what he would have to say about all this if he were around today.
    Drug and smoke free trading.

    Hidden Content
    Hidden Content cardscomicsmoviesandgames
    Hidden Content darkdemon202404

  8. #28




    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,979
    SCF Rewards
    1,033
    Country
    See j80rice's Items on eBay

    I was not criticizing Republicans for doing it. I was explaining why Obama did it. And Obama did not lie about changing things when he became President. A lie is something said that you know to be untrue at the time you say it. If anything, he was naive to think he could change the unchangeable.

    can I use this as proof of my previous statement? he did not attempt change from minute 1. he came in and has purposefully done everything the exact same. But, for you, it isn't a lie, he was just naive. Poor poor obama.

  9. #29







    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    56
    Posts
    19,098
    SCF Rewards
    1,943
    Blog Entries
    6
    Country

    I was not criticizing Republicans for doing it. I was explaining why Obama did it. And Obama did not lie about changing things when he became President. A lie is something said that you know to be untrue at the time you say it. If anything, he was naive to think he could change the unchangeable.

    Public inspection of laws before passing them - He had every option to allow public inspection of Obamacare before passing it. The Republicans did not make them force it thru before that could be done, they opposed pushing it thru so quickly. Obamacare could have sat for months to allow public review. The Dem controlled House and Senate forced it thru quickly to prevent it from being reviewed. Even Nancy Pelosi said "we need to pass it so we can see what is in it" (advocation of passing it before review).
    Net result: Lie

    Bipartisanship - He claimed that he would work to create bipartisanship yet when the Republicans took Congress he announced that he would veto any budget cuts that the Republicans sent to him. That is not building bipartisan relationships, it is creating partisan division.
    Net result: Lie

    Back-room deals and cronyism - He promised no shady deals behind closed doors and no special favors for party friends. This may be the biggest joke of all as he has done virtually nothing but appoint his supporters to czar positions and scratch the back of industries that are either owned by liberals or that funded his campaign. Republicans did not force him to do that.
    Net result: Lie

    The only thing he was naive about was thinking the American people were too stupid to see thru his lies.

  10. #30




    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    51
    Posts
    10,729
    SCF Rewards
    425
    Country
    See Star_Cards's Items on eBay

    You mean not willing to cave! How many czars is he going to appoint? I guess he needs all he can have since he can not do anything himself. Guess he needs them so he can spend more time tuning his golf game.

    UGH. there's that word CAVE again. they are supposed to work together. each side just standing on their side and not negotiating is what the problem with the system is. it's really not one person or party or administration.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Sponsors



Follow SCF on