Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
03-10-2012, 12:12 AM #1
Who Decided That Retired Goalies Make Good Analysts
...
Curious minds want to know. Jamie McLennen looks like he should be working in a Funeral Home.
Glen Healey is just obnoxious, and Darren Pang gets picked on, even by Bums that play in the league today. Lol
Kelly Hrudey is good, objective, and can speak in full sentences, mind ya.
...Last edited by centrehice; 03-10-2012 at 12:17 AM.
-
-
03-10-2012, 12:42 AM #2
I'm also not a fan of Darren Pang at all. He's laughing and not taking things seriously far too often. As a result, I can't take him seriously. Can't say that the bullying he endures is cool though. It's not, it's not funny, and his peers should stand up for him more often. A good time to make reference to a very thoughtful comment you made not too long ago about the lack of equality and respect society places on people of shorter stature. One of my favourite comments I've read on the board in a while!
Healey's stances on most issues are predictable - in line with the old guard, a reflection of an era that is long gone.
Hrudy - well-spoken, but they don't use him enough.
McLennan - I don't mind him at all. I think he's very green in the industry still, but I enjoy his demeanor and analysis most of the time.
Not so much of a fan of Greg Millen either. EXCUSES for the goalie on every goal, it's tiring.
-
03-10-2012, 01:42 AM #3
Millen and John Garrett are a match made in Heaven, although Garrett is such an obnoxious Canucks homer, He is terrible at being objective.
Garrett is as bad an analyst, as Jack Edwards is at Play-By-Play. One-Eyed Homers.
-
