Trayvon Martin

[duane1969]

You are right 2nd degree murder does not carry a death sentence but that does not change the fact that mudering a child is still wrong.

So I take it that you are ok with adults killing random children and getting away with it?

At this point I am going on the assumption that you are

A) Incapable of comprehending what the definition of a child is

and

B) Are either so biased that you can not discuss this isue with any logical capability or are intentionally trying to stir the pot

[BGT Masters]

At this point I am going on the assumption that you are

A) Incapable of comprehending what the definition of a child is

and

B) Are either so biased that you can not discuss this isue with any logical capability or are intentionally trying to stir the pot

[jlzinck]

So if the prosecution had this picture and did not disclose it Zimmerman will walk if it even goes to trial...

Check this out from a "right wing whackjob conservative" lol

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...cution-immoral

After the release of the photo, however, Dershowitz went much further, telling Breitbart News that if the prosecutors did have the photo and didn’t mention it in the affidavit, that would constitute a “grave ethical violation,” since affidavits are supposed to contain “all relevant information.”
Dershowitz continued, “An affidavit that willfully misstates undisputed evidence known to the prosecution is not only unethical but borders on perjury because an affiant swears to tell not only the truth, but the whole truth, and suppressing an important part of the whole truth is a lie."

[boba]

At this point I am going on the assumption that you are

A) Incapable of comprehending what the definition of a child is

and

B) Are either so biased that you can not discuss this isue with any logical capability or are intentionally trying to stir the pot

CHURCH




Sorry, had to do it. :)

[habsheaven]

So if the prosecution had this picture and did not disclose it Zimmerman will walk if it even goes to trial...

Check this out from a "right wing whackjob conservative" lol

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...cution-immoral

After the release of the photo, however, Dershowitz went much further, telling Breitbart News that if the prosecutors did have the photo and didn’t mention it in the affidavit, that would constitute a “grave ethical violation,” since affidavits are supposed to contain “all relevant information.”
Dershowitz continued, “An affidavit that willfully misstates undisputed evidence known to the prosecution is not only unethical but borders on perjury because an affiant swears to tell not only the truth, but the whole truth, and suppressing an important part of the whole truth is a lie."

There is something wrong with this article. Forget that we don't even know that the prosecution had the photo; an affidavit does not have to lay out the entire case to the defense. That is what discovery is for.

[mikesilvia]

You are right 2nd degree murder does not carry a death sentence but that does not change the fact that mudering a child is still wrong.

How many children do you know that 1) are over 6 feet tall and 2) stomp grown men for 60 seconds.

Martin was not a 40 lb elementary school kid like you make him out to be.

At 17 years old, I was a golden gloves boxer and could beat up most men at my weight class. To think that a 17 year old in high school is a"child" and can't commit crimes or beat up grown men means to me that you've never lived in an inner city or seen the size of Florida/Texas high school athletes.

[gladdyontherise]

Can't 17 year old "children" go on trial and be treated as an adult anyhow in court? I mean really, how can you consider Martin a "child"?

Forget that he was 17 and not 18, no random person would look at him and consider him a "child". When I think of a child, I think of someone who is 7, not 17.

[mikesilvia]

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...cution-immoral

[GrimUSMC]

There is something wrong with this article. Forget that we don't even know that the prosecution had the photo; an affidavit does not have to lay out the entire case to the defense. That is what discovery is for.

You can argue that, sure.

Also, it is an almost certainty that of the police had the photo, the prosecutor had the photo. Unless it got lost somewhere somehow.

[GrimUSMC]

Yes he does but zimmerman will still have to stand before him and be judged for the actions that he committed.

And if someone was slamming your head into the pavement trying to seriously injure and or kill you, what would you do? How would that person be judged?

At this time, there is STILL evidence missing to warrant a second degree murder charge. So I will wait until I see all the evidence laid out before I can make a judgement. I will say this though. At this point, there is zero evidence of second degree murder. Using "spin" language like calling Zimmerman a "child killer" does not help the cause one bit.