Results 11 to 20 of 21
-
04-03-2012, 01:45 PM #11
I don't see it as liberals painting an image of the GOP fighting a war against women. I see it as chelsea saying that she sympathizes with rush speaking about her in a negative manner. although with chelsea, rush really had no reason to discuss her looks at all. I hardly see it as some liberal conspiracy.
-
-
04-03-2012, 06:19 PM #12
I the mean time Rush Limbuagh's ratings are through the roof , and Liberal radio still is looking for listeners.
-
04-03-2012, 06:22 PM #13
That is not relevant. He said something bad about two women in a 20 year span so there is clear evidence here that he targets women in his attacks.
-
-
04-04-2012, 08:45 AM #14
Who's claiming that he's a women attacker? I read the article more as chelsea sympathizing not some "liberal" conspiracy to paint rush in a certain light. Rush paints himself in the light that people see him. He doesn't need anyone else to help paint him in a negative light from time to time.
-
04-04-2012, 10:06 AM #15

just read the third post in this thread
-
-
04-04-2012, 11:35 AM #16
-
04-04-2012, 12:02 PM #17
I said it and I stand by what I said.
Drug and smoke free trading.
Hidden Content
Hidden Content cardscomicsmoviesandgames
Hidden Content darkdemon202404
-
-
04-04-2012, 12:04 PM #18
-
04-04-2012, 12:06 PM #19
ah... I thought you were talking about an eluded liberal agenda as posted previously by someone else.
-
04-04-2012, 12:13 PM #20
-













