Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1




    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    15,120
    SCF Rewards
    361
    Country
    See bbra9027's Items on eBay

    Republicans block FCC password amendment

    Gotta love those republicans, huh

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...ef=mostpopular
    Drug and smoke free trading.

    Hidden Content
    Hidden Content cardscomicsmoviesandgames
    Hidden Content darkdemon202404

  2. #2




    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Age
    57
    Posts
    9,435
    SCF Rewards
    376
    Country
    See bodyelectricmethod's Items on eBay

    wrong link my freind

  3. #3




    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    51
    Posts
    10,729
    SCF Rewards
    425
    Country
    See Star_Cards's Items on eBay

    yeah. I was confused.

  4. #4







    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    56
    Posts
    19,098
    SCF Rewards
    1,943
    Blog Entries
    6
    Country

    They are blocking an FCC password to Unger being gay? I am confused.

  5. #5







    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    56
    Posts
    19,098
    SCF Rewards
    1,943
    Blog Entries
    6
    Country

    For clarification, the Facebook password amendment was voted down. Of course the liberal media is going to run around banging their drums screaming about how Republicans don't want to protect your privacy. As usual they will look like the babbling idiots that they always do because their "articles" are based on lies, deception and dim-witted propaganda.

    Republicans voted this down for two reasons:

    1) By itself, it doesn't do anything. We are already given the same basic protection by dozens of laws, court rulings and the 4th Amendment. Employers have no legal ground to demand your password and if they fire you for not giving it to them then you DO have the legal ground to sue the pants off of them.

    The real question should be why are the Democrats wasting taxpayer dollars to protect something that is already protected?

    2) The only reason this was put forth by Democrats is to try and delay a vote on the GOP-supported FCC Process Reform Act which Democrats strongly oppose because it requires transparency by the FCC. I am not sure why they oppose transparency by a government agency since that is one of the things that Obama promised.

    Still need proof that this is grandstanding an a waste of taxpayer dollars by the Democrats? Congressman Ed Perlmutter, the "author" of the Facebook password amendment already had his chance to protect your internet privacy rights less than 4 years ago...he voted against it http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2008/roll437.xml

    And if Perlmutter really, truly wanted this amendment passed then the best way to get it done would have been to have it added to the FCC Process Reform Act. The fact that it was not added to the FCC Process Reform Act and that they insisted that it be voted on before the FCC Process Reform Act is proof enough that it wasn't about protecting your privacy, it was about trying to delay the vote on the FCC Process Reform Act.
    Last edited by duane1969; 04-27-2012 at 10:32 AM.

  6. #6




    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    10,135
    SCF Rewards
    903
    Country

    For clarification, the Facebook password amendment was voted down. Of course the liberal media is going to run around banging their drums screaming about how Republicans don't want to protect your privacy. As usual they will look like the babbling idiots that they always do because their "articles" are based on lies, deception and dim-witted propaganda.

    Republicans voted this down for two reasons:

    1) By itself, it doesn't do anything. We are already given the same basic protection by dozens of laws, court rulings and the 4th Amendment. Employers have no legal ground to demand your password and if they fire you for not giving it to them then you DO have the legal ground to sue the pants off of them.

    The real question should be why are the Democrats wasting taxpayer dollars to protect something that is already protected?

    2) The only reason this was put forth by Democrats is to try and delay a vote on the GOP-supported FCC Process Reform Act which Democrats strongly oppose because it requires transparency by the FCC. I am not sure why they oppose transparency by a government agency since that is one of the things that Obama promised.

    Still need proof that this is grandstanding an a waste of taxpayer dollars by the Democrats? Congressman Ed Perlmutter, the "author" of the Facebook password amendment already had his chance to protect your internet privacy rights less than 4 years ago...he voted against it http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2008/roll437.xml

    And if Perlmutter really, truly wanted this amendment passed then the best way to get it done would have been to have it added to the FCC Process Reform Act. The fact that it was not added to the FCC Process Reform Act and that they insisted that it be voted on before the FCC Process Reform Act is proof enough that it wasn't about protecting your privacy, it was about trying to delay the vote on the FCC Process Reform Act.

    Thanks for the information.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Sponsors



Follow SCF on