Results 1 to 10 of 11
-
05-24-2012, 12:07 AM #1
Wow...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...#ht_500wt_1361
Really $1.30 for a patch auto out of a product that costs $200 a box..there fore $50 on average a hit? Is this what cards are worth now...
-
-
05-24-2012, 12:26 AM #2
Yepp.......Its only a Jumbo Jersey but if it were a patch if may have brought like $5-$10 lol
Collecting All Current Las Vegas Raiders, Carmelo Anthony, Ken Griffey Jr, Bo Jackson, Frank Thomas.
plus many more, Also any Legend or HOF raider players as well.
Just getting back into the Hobby so not much tradebait but have some stuff just let me know what your looking for and i will see what i have, No trade List Available yet but i am working on one.
Hidden Content
-
05-24-2012, 02:39 AM #3
Never ever heard that player before plus it ain't patch just regular jersey which makes the sale price justifable.
-
-
05-24-2012, 01:27 PM #4
Just shows you how watered down these so called "high end" products really are.
-
05-24-2012, 01:30 PM #5
That's the risk you run when you open a box. There's no guarantee of making money.
-
-
05-24-2012, 02:16 PM #6

Also was $3.95 shipping lol
-
05-24-2012, 03:03 PM #7
Damn, I would of brought that. Maybe even splashed to $2.
-
-
05-24-2012, 03:26 PM #8
maybe it would have been worth more if he was related to kyle orton
-
05-25-2012, 11:39 AM #9
Young players like him don't belong in panini's "high end" products. It's like Jed Clampett living in Beverly Hills, just don't belong. And as everyone else has said that is not a patch, it's a jersey!
On a side note, is it just me or are all the (i'm assuming) new collectors referring to jersey cards as patch cards? Yes people there is an immense difference!
-
05-25-2012, 02:35 PM #10
True, not a patch card, but they have put less meaningful players in these "highend" products like Luke Harangody this guy has silouhette autos, and other autos in preferred as well. He has yet to play more then 21 games a year or probably more then 10 min at a time...Panini doesn't get it sometimes, upper deck would not have put nameless players in expensive products...
-


















