Bigfoot is REAL! Well, see for yourself....

[JustAlex]

OK, so here we go, Bigfoot....a legendary creature who the majority of the people do not believe in due to lack of evidence.

But now, a new group that supposedly has been looking for bigfoot for 5 years says they have video and DNA evidence of bigfoot.





Source: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.1473883


SO....why am I posting this?

Because, I currently DO NOT believe in Bigfoot....the reason I don't is due to the lack of evidence.

HOWEVER, if sufficient and INDISPUTABLE evidence were brought to light, then I would change my beliefs.

What about you?

[shrewsbury]

sure, but bigfoot is a biological creature, not a spirit or a God. Thus bigfoot could be proven by empirical evidence.

I have seen the film and still say Pattersons is better

[duane1969]

I don't see anything that is evidence in that video footage. I see no big feet, no hands, no face...nothing that identifies it as a Bigfoot. As soon as I saw the pic my first thought was "ghillie suit". After watching the very short video that provides a very limited angle and little else, I still think it looks like a guy in a homemade ghillie suit made using either animal or human hair.

Among the genetic and visual findings presented by the group in Dallas on Tuesday is video of what is described as "a reddish brown Sasquatch juvenile" sleeping in the woods after being tracked with her mother.

The juvenile is said to be just one of many witnessed and filmed in person by the researchers.

If they have multiple videos of multiple Bigfoots filmed in person, why release just one 12 second clip that shows nothing but a furry lump? If you are trying to convince the world that you have proof of Bigfoot then why keep evidence hidden?

I have seen enough Bigfoot hoax videos to take that one with a big grain of salt.

[duane1969]

I don't see anything that is evidence in that video footage. I see no big feet, no hands, no face...nothing that identifies it as a Bigfoot. As soon as I saw the pic my first thought was "ghillie suit". After watching the very short video that provides a very limited angle and little else, I still think it looks like a guy in a homemade ghillie suit made using either animal or human hair.

Among the genetic and visual findings presented by the group in Dallas on Tuesday is video of what is described as "a reddish brown Sasquatch juvenile" sleeping in the woods after being tracked with her mother.

The juvenile is said to be just one of many witnessed and filmed in person by the researchers.

If they have multiple videos of multiple Bigfoots filmed in person, why release just one 12 second clip that shows nothing but a furry lump? If you are trying to convince the world that you have proof of Bigfoot then why keep evidence hidden?

I have seen enough Bigfoot hoax videos to take that one with a big grain of salt.

[MadMan1978]

This in no means is a P&R topic

[centrehice]

That first photo looks like the stuff you put in flower beds, you know, the thing looking bark-chips with dirt.