Where is this patch from ???

[ish3417]

Can't find anything like this patch on Bruins Jersey. Any ideas ?

krug.jpg

[dmaksymyshyn]

probably just lettering of some sort that was stitched onto the jersey where the seam or colors black and yellow meet...from a photoshoot. They sew all sorts of stuff on the back of those jerseys...letters not in their last name could be used. I have seen that being done for years.

[RGM81]

Rookie photoshoot jerseys don't necessarily look like a standard jersey. They'll tend to stitch on additional patches.

[Drewk86a]

Looks like the patch portion could be from the 90 year anniversary patch, but I can't find any photos which show a patch with a black-to-gold transition underneath the patch.

[MattDMC]

[the_nange]

Wow.... where did you get this picture? Cause it's awesome (in the sense it shows us how much of a joke those rookie photoshoot jersey patches can be).

[MattDMC]

Wow.... where did you get this picture? Cause it's awesome (in the sense it shows us how much of a joke those rookie photoshoot jersey patches can be).

I found it when somebody else posted it on another forum, much like this one:





Sure its football but I'm sure the same has applied in Hockey at least once.

[Zorro]

That is why event-worn is a joke because it was fabricated purely for profit...there is no significance or attachment to the game. But to each their own!

[ChuckNorrisFearsS]

That's suuuuch a joke. There's still some who think UD can do no wrong though in their products. I just don't get why anyone would want to own "event used" when THIS is how its contrived.

[Drewk86a]

When you see how far they will go to be able to make the "player worn" claim it puts a whole new perspective on things. When you really get down to it does a patch or jersey swatch have more value simply because a player touched it? Game used? Yes, that to me, is something special. Even used, photo shoot used, etc... They are no different that manufactured patches.