Autographed Rookie Redemptions 2014-15 artifacts card number V = Auto rookie II ???

[jefferx]

Anybody could explain these ? The checklist for Auto rookie redemption Artifacts 2014-15 is weird
Look at this: The card number is not always correspond to the rookie number !!!!
Why ?

Autographed Rookie Redemptions	I	Auto Rookie I
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	V	Auto Rookie II
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	X	Auto Rookie III
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	II	Auto Rookie IV
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	IV	Auto Rookie V
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	IX	Auto Rookie VI
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	VI	Auto Rookie VII
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	XI	Auto Rookie VIII
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	XV	Auto Rookie IX
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	III	Auto Rookie X
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	VII	Auto Rookie XI
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	XII	Auto Rookie XII
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	XIV	Auto Rookie XIII
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	XVI	Auto Rookie XIV
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	VIII	Auto Rookie XV
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	XIII	Auto Rookie XVI
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	XVII	Auto Rookie XVII
Autographed Rookie Redemptions	XVIII	Auto Rookie XVIII

[RGM81]

I'd suggest to you that it's an obvious error in the list.

[Drewk86a]

I'll take a crack at it.

The column of roman numerals are listed in numerical order.
The "Auto Rookie ###" column is listed in alphabetical order. The database reads these roman numerals as text. So I comes before II which is before III, etc...

Looks like a coding or sorting error. Probably does not reflect the true identification of the cards. I would assume the roman numeral column and the "Auto Rookie ###" column do match up in the real world.

[30ranfordfan]

Looks like an error in the import.

[andrewconnors9]

yeah they wouldnt mix with the numbers as that would screw the secondary market for people buying the singles, you pay for II and then end up with V? people will be quite angry