Results 11 to 20 of 115
-
11-10-2014, 11:46 AM #11
Yes. If you are going to make some drugs legal than all drugs should be legal.
-
-
11-10-2014, 12:01 PM #12
Ahh, yep. On par with the Liberal talking heads.
-
11-10-2014, 12:20 PM #13
Dealing with a family member with lung cancer at 60 is no better than dealing with a crackhead at 30.
when those with lung cancer, steal, lie, cheat, kill, and prostitute to keep being a lung cancer patient, get back to me.
Otherwise this is the worse case of apples and oranges I have seen in a while.
also, since one "drug" is legal they all should be?
I wold hope you are talking recreational drugs, but who knows?
-
-
11-10-2014, 12:26 PM #14
Yes, I guess it is. Now how about your opinion. On par with the conservative talking heads? Or is it all your own?
Regardless of where you came up with your opinion, try explaining the hypocrisy of it.
Why are products like tobacco and alcohol (both proven to be detrimental to one's health) allowed, and marijuana isn't?
-
11-10-2014, 12:33 PM #15
I wasn't aware that ALL drug addicts stole , lied, cheated, murdered and prostituted. I will bet you a fair number of alcoholics do though. My comparison was in regards to the affect being either (drug addict or cancer patient) had on the family.
Tell someone affected by lung cancer that it isn't as bad. See what they say about it.
Yes, recreational drugs.
-
-
11-10-2014, 12:45 PM #16
Tell someone affected by lung cancer that it isn't as bad. See what they say about it.
who said it was or wasn't as bad?
tell them you think they are on the same level as a crack addict.
maybe you should get out more or stop reading all liberal based material?
-
11-10-2014, 12:53 PM #17
Maybe you should follow your own advice. I have lived and worked in the same bad end of town for 35 years.
Once again, you are misreading my points so that you can argue against them. Does it ever end?
-
-
11-10-2014, 01:07 PM #18
You implied as much when you said; "this is the worst case of apples and oranges you have seen in awhile"
no you assumed someone implied this so you could argue with your nonsense. If YOU READ you would see that I was saying what a bad comparison you were making, but the classic liberal approach to switch it when you have no good points.
Again you are misreading the comparison. It was a comparison of the affects, not the person.
affects and symptoms not even close, again apple to oranges.
Once again, you are misreading my points so that you can argue against them. Does it ever end?
back at you
-
11-10-2014, 01:24 PM #19
So does this make you an expert on crack cocaine? How often do you attend NA meetings, assuming you don't use anymore?
-
11-10-2014, 01:34 PM #20
I was comparing the affects on others of both. You are saying I am comparing the person involved. That's the only apples and oranges that applies, and you are the one doing it.
-