Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
02-24-2007, 11:27 PM #1
Deal or No Deal
With all the hype surrounding the possible superstars to be traded, the trade deadline landed with a hard thud. Only 2 moves were made on the trade deadline, which was highly unexpected by fans who wanted to see at least one big trade. Granted the Warriors and Pacers completed a blockbuster trade already, but that wasn't on the deadline. There have been numberous big trades on the deadline, why not this year?
:thumbsdown:
-
-
02-25-2007, 12:05 AM #2
because wade got injured now reams think they got a chance lol
-
02-25-2007, 12:13 AM #3
the warriors/pacers trade and the iverson deal were both pretty big, just nothing at the deadline. pretty anti-climatic. this year has had alot of injuries so many teams are just waiting to get healthy i guess. they are just like chris said thinking that other team's injuries help enough, so addition by subtraction.
-
-
02-25-2007, 12:14 AM #4
I wish Bibby would have come to Cleveland......oh well....
-
02-25-2007, 03:55 PM #5
Who would the Kings have gotten? Drew Gooden? Overrated. Larry Huges? Injury prone. Eric Snow? Don't make me laugh. I would've taken D.Gibson, but the Cavs defnately don't want to give him up.
-
-
02-25-2007, 08:13 PM #6
They wanted Gooden....
Besides, it would have had to have been a 3-team deal, b/c Sac wanted a Draft Pick, and we don't have any.
-
02-28-2007, 08:28 PM #7
Well I wish we would've traded Bibby, to better the future of our franchise, but Bibby is still one of the best PGs in the league. He unfrortunately gets overshadowed by the big name PGs in the league b/c he's playing in the west.
-
Originally Posted by BaySportsFan54 
