Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1





    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Age
    43
    Posts
    12,218
    SCF Rewards
    1,521
    Country
    See hagansp's Items on eBay

    Mike Vick close to losing Nike?

    The National Humane Society has sent a letter to Nike asking them to sever ties with Vick..this would be big news...heres the letter


    http://www.hsus.org/web-files/PDF/ni...er_june-18.pdf

  2. #2






    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    47
    Posts
    12,656
    SCF Rewards
    1,877
    Country
    See randallscardsales's Items on eBay

    is he any closer to being charged? i mean dang is this gonna be like the Bush story where he took $$ while playing at USC and we never hear about it again or what?

  3. #3





    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Age
    43
    Posts
    12,218
    SCF Rewards
    1,521
    Country
    See hagansp's Items on eBay

    the 2 dont even compare

  4. #4




    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    61
    Posts
    12,023
    Country
    See leeara123's Items on eBay

    Yeah I agree....... With Bush there was some aligations tossed out.

    With Vick...people (family/friends) telling tales to the Feds about this story!
    My main concern is this doesn't turn into a witch hunt like Barry Bonds. The feds jump into case and go after anyone trying to flip someone! Last time I checked they are both innocent till proven guilty.

  5. #5





    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Age
    43
    Posts
    12,218
    SCF Rewards
    1,521
    Country
    See hagansp's Items on eBay

    eh...bonds i disagree....vick is guilty...he owns the house...he is responsible.

  6. #6




    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    61
    Posts
    12,023
    Country
    See leeara123's Items on eBay

    Come on Sean use some common sense..... He owns the house so he is automatically guilty?

    Guess everyone that ever rented a home to crack dealers are responsible also?

    To prove my point even further................... Why don't you ask the Duke lacrosse team about unsubstaniated allogations!!! The ruining of people lives to further others means.

    I'm not saying Vick is innocent....but the media runs way too far with these stories in hope of a scoop..Forget about who gets tramped in the process.....

  7. #7





    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Age
    43
    Posts
    12,218
    SCF Rewards
    1,521
    Country
    See hagansp's Items on eBay

    guilty/responsible= yes...if you rent to a drug dealer...yes your responsible too...you own it...its yours. he's involved...or he or his agent...or someone would have said something.

    the duke case was a case of a DA who was in over his head and wanted to make a name for himself...this isnt even in court yet...anytime theres the word rape...its blown up...

  8. #8




    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,822
    SCF Rewards
    4,671
    Country
    See CaliforniaSoxfan's Items on eBay

    Personally I think Vick is guilty as well. He owned the house, was witnessed at the house on numerous occasions, many dead pitbulls were found buried on the property, tools associated with dog fighting were also found, Vick is a registered Pitbull breader, witnesses have come forward about him being seen at dog fights. Yes I think some of the claims of him being seen at dog fights are probably false but there are too many coincedences involved for this to just be a guilty by association case.

  9. #9






    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    47
    Posts
    12,656
    SCF Rewards
    1,877
    Country
    See randallscardsales's Items on eBay

    Personally I think Vick is guilty as well. He owned the house, was witnessed at the house on numerous occasions, many dead pitbulls were found buried on the property, tools associated with dog fighting were also found, Vick is a registered Pitbull breader, witnesses have come forward about him being seen at dog fights. Yes I think some of the claims of him being seen at dog fights are probably false but there are too many coincedences involved for this to just be a guilty by association case.



    I Agree with Guilty but when they gonna charge the guy?

  10. #10




    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    35
    Posts
    109
    SCF Rewards
    560

    Normally I would give the benefit of doubt to Vick , but I seen something on Espn with witnesses saying Vick was one of the "Big Dogs" in the dog fighting.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Sponsors



Follow SCF on