View Poll Results: Game Over for Boston?
- Voters
- 33. This poll is closed
-
Yes
11 33.33% -
No
22 66.67%
Results 101 to 110 of 133
-
05-27-2008, 08:53 PM #101
hey im defending the celtics so SHHHHHH. haha
-
-
05-27-2008, 09:03 PM #102
yes i am proud of him and i tell him that all the time, (we all had rough childhoods). the big 3 arent the best combo, they may have more talent but certaintly arent the best. from this season no they are not
amare stoudemire, steve nash, shawn marion (when they were together)
tim duncan, manu ginobilli, tony parker
are they worse than garnett, alen pierce
and i cant wait till the celtics loose, they arent deep enough. once the big 3 get introuble with fouls etc they crumble
-
05-27-2008, 09:05 PM #103

yes 26 rings lol
lets go yankees
and lets go lakers and pistons
lol
-
-
05-27-2008, 11:52 PM #104
Call me bias, but Duncan, Parker, Ginobili are the best trio in the NBA. Three championship rings. Until the Boston trio wins at least one, the argument that they are the best trio does not hold much weight in my eyes. Same can be said for the Lakers trio.
-
05-28-2008, 12:00 AM #105
Call me bias, but Duncan, Parker, Ginobili are the best trio in the NBA. Three championship rings. Until the Boston trio wins at least one, the argument that they are the best trio does not hold much weight in my eyes. Same can be said for the Lakers trio.
As far as trios, yeah, your right.. three rings for the spurs.. your right..but for the spurs sake, they gotta lot of winning to do.. I would love to see the Lakers out of it now..
-
-
05-28-2008, 12:07 AM #106
and i cant wait till the celtics loose, they arent deep enough. once the big 3 get introuble with fouls etc they crumble
ouch.. I beg to differ... cassell, posey, and P.J. Brown might say differently.. between the three of them, there is 4-5 rings??
-
05-28-2008, 12:12 AM #107
The spurs may have 3 rings, but they've been together for years and years. This is the FIRST year for boston's trio and look how much they've accomplished. They have the biggest turnaround stats from last season to this season in NBA history. I'm sure if Boston's trio stays together as long as the Spurs trio has, then they'll have alot more than just 3 rings to show for it.
-
-
05-28-2008, 12:18 AM #108
The spurs may have 3 rings, but they've been together for years and years. This is the FIRST year for boston's trio and look how much they've accomplished. They have the biggest turnaround stats from last season to this season in NBA history. I'm sure if Boston's trio stays together as long as the Spurs trio has, then they'll have alot more than just 3 rings to show for it.
I agree.. Boston didnt do to bad this year considering this is only the first season and post season for these guys together.. I am hoping another championship banner hits the roof this year..
-
05-28-2008, 12:26 AM #109
One reason for Boston having the biggest turnaround was them beating up on the weak Eastern Conference teams. Granted, they did play very well against the West.
The Spurs trio of Duncan, Parker, Ginobili have won three NBA championships in five years. Their first year together they won a championship (yes David Robinson was on that team). Lets see if Boston wins a championship in their first year. :)
-
05-28-2008, 10:24 AM #110

spurs 3 rings duncan parker manu popovich
lakers 3 rings kobe shaq fisher phill jackson lol
robert horry 7 rings lol
lakers 3 2000 -2002
rockets 2 94, 95
spurs 2 2005 2007
bulls pippen jordan 6 rings lol
-
















