View Poll Results: Was this a foul?
- Voters
- 20. This poll is closed
-
Yes
11 55.00% -
No
9 45.00%
Results 1 to 10 of 29
-
05-28-2008, 12:33 AM #1
Controversial play: Lakers vs Spurs Game 4
I just uploaded this. It was a foul that needed to be called. Joey Crawford was officiating the game.
-
-
05-28-2008, 12:41 AM #2

Yep, definite foul. But, it was probably because it looked like Barry tried to initiate the contact by moving his shoulders into Fisher's hips and the refs didn't fall for it.
-
05-28-2008, 12:55 AM #3
-
-
05-28-2008, 12:58 AM #4

Yea, but a foul on the floor would've meant 2 free throws for the Spurs and that could've tied the game. But, if any team can come back from a 3-1 deficit, the Spurs would have to be that team.
-
05-28-2008, 12:58 AM #5
No comment.
-
-
05-28-2008, 01:09 AM #6
Andrew-I agree.
Trevor-ah come on man, you gotta say something! There's no hard feelings here.
Sadly, there were terrible calls both ways in this game. Many youtube comments are saying that Barry traveled on that play. My response? If you call that a travel then you need to call all of Kobe's pushoffs.
-
05-28-2008, 01:10 AM #7
Okay, It was a foul but it was an OFFENSIVE foul. lol
-
-
05-28-2008, 01:12 AM #8
-
05-28-2008, 01:21 AM #9
Refs have been screwy all series... i know all of kobe shots havent been wide open. There was a number of drives there was contact and there was no foul all game.
Brent Barry, Coach Pop, Phil and each player said the same thing. not a foul rather they really thought so or not
also the play before that, fishers shot hit the rim but the shot clock didnt reset which woulda meant lakers ball few seconds left and getting free throws with a 2 point lead.. they missed that too..
LAKERS WIN END OF STORY
-
05-28-2008, 01:40 AM #10
Nah I am just joking, to be honest it was a foul and Barry should have gotten 2 shots.
-















