Results 21 to 30 of 63
-
08-04-2008, 07:27 PM #21
I've been wondering the same thing.
If you have to pay for any form of pricing including My Collections (or Organize now), that would REALLY suck.
-
-
08-04-2008, 07:28 PM #22
To use thier messaging boards you have to pay?!!??!?!?
-
08-04-2008, 07:31 PM #23
for all the times they talk about "free" stuff, its not very free.lol
i have been logged in there site to get mycollections restored and this is how close i am after 6+ hours
Welcome to Organize! Please be patient while we convert your collection(s). You are currently in position 643. You will receive a message in your beckett.com inbox when the conversion is complete. i'll probably wake up tommorow and it'll still be not done yetHidden Content
Dan LeFevour PC 192/283
-
-
08-04-2008, 08:30 PM #24
The site stinks, yes you will have to pay to trade although not yet, as for looking stuff up. If you have OPG type in the serch bar your card say 2001 Bowman Chrome Albert Pujols it will pull up choices some with pictures click on the one you want and it will have the book value.
-
08-04-2008, 08:49 PM #25
Yeah I always used my collections to look up the value of the card for free.
-
-
08-04-2008, 09:17 PM #26
-
08-04-2008, 09:20 PM #27
i registered around 12:30-1:00 and am 606 still.
and
i sent this email, and i will call tommorow. i felt a little better after ranting on them
I am one of the hundreds who think that this new site is a JOKE. this is not a user friendly site and you always claim and praise yourselves on how free the site is.. well mycollections now cost to know the value of your collection? this is ridiculous, i will be calling tommorow as well, and i and every other person i know am not happy. how do you justify to make people pay to trade cards? you really have turned this hobby into a poorly ran buisness. i hope you know all your former members are leaving and coming to other trading sites that make trading free since this is a hobby. i want some satisfaction and not the traditional "thanks for your concerns, we will look into this".
- sincerly a very unhappy person
-
-
08-04-2008, 09:21 PM #28
It's terrible. Not much more to say about it.
-
08-04-2008, 09:22 PM #29
Im not to happy about it myself.
-
08-04-2008, 09:33 PM #30
Wow, I really am noticing alot of members with under 50 posts now, not that that's a bad thing. I personally have problems looking things up in the physicall book of Beckett. I would use Tuff Sutff, but it takes them like ten years to put values for the new products, and they have no articles(which I do enjoy in Beckett).
-

















