anyone think this is funny??

[aw00d05]

if you skip to 3 minutes in it's hilarious..."pipe down bill"
that guy is the most arrogant guy i have ever seen, no surprise he is with obama...he tries to hide from all the tough questions and can only say fox sucks when they are the most unbiased news network out there...
http://www.foxnews.com/video/index.h...istId=playlist

[mintman2]

It's a shame there's no way to skip to 3 minutes in as i prefer to not have to listen to "that man that doesn't look like all the other men on our money" for three minutes straight again.

[aw00d05]

It's a shame there's no way to skip to 3 minutes in as i prefer to not have to listen to "that man that doesn't look like all the other men on our money" for three minutes straight again.

he is very annoying i should find the exact moment she goes nuts on em, but it just shows how obama is.

[Yanksfan396]

[QUOTE=aw00d05;4212273]if you skip to 3 minutes in it's hilarious..."pipe down bill"
that guy is the most arrogant guy i have ever seen, no surprise he is with obama...he tries to hide from all the tough questions and can only say fox sucks when they are the most unbiased news network out there...QUOTE]

Are you serious or do you just like to say silly things?

[ensbergcollector]

[QUOTE=Yanksfan396;4213808]

if you skip to 3 minutes in it's hilarious..."pipe down bill"
that guy is the most arrogant guy i have ever seen, no surprise he is with obama...he tries to hide from all the tough questions and can only say fox sucks when they are the most unbiased news network out there...QUOTE]

Are you serious or do you just like to say silly things?

for what it's worth, citing the poll she does, fox news was rated as the least bias of all the major news sources. this was a legit poll and not some made up stats.

[themanishere]

There is no such thing as a news network that is anywhere close to being unbiased.

A poll that reports on something as abstract as news bias is highly unlikely to be valid. Is it measuring what we think it measures? How logical is it to attempt to quantify or rate someting like bias? I would imagine the data for that is opinion-based, therefore subject to differing interpretations of bias. Subsequently, reliability of the 'ratings' comes into question (to what degree can we say the ratings are true across a broader spectrum). Just because it was done by a 'legit' research group does not mean the poll is legit.

That aside, the video was pretty funny. Obama's campaign should have picked someone with more control to appear. Then again, I'm not a big fan of news anchors trying to act like they know something. I would rather see established people in politics (probably former politicans and the like), who actually know the stuff from an inside perspective, prod the campaigns on tough issues. THAT would be interesting, but it will never happen.

[Star_Cards]

[QUOTE=Yanksfan396;4213808]

if you skip to 3 minutes in it's hilarious..."pipe down bill"
that guy is the most arrogant guy i have ever seen, no surprise he is with obama...he tries to hide from all the tough questions and can only say fox sucks when they are the most unbiased news network out there...QUOTE]

Are you serious or do you just like to say silly things?

lol.

Just because a network says they are fair and balanced doesn't mean they are. If that sort of thing really worked then I'm super rich and look like brad pitt. :)

[aw00d05]

[quote=Yanksfan396;4213808]

if you skip to 3 minutes in it's hilarious..."pipe down bill"
that guy is the most arrogant guy i have ever seen, no surprise he is with obama...he tries to hide from all the tough questions and can only say fox sucks when they are the most unbiased news network out there...QUOTE]

Are you serious or do you just like to say silly things?

just as ensberg said watch the video theres a poll about it...

[aw00d05]

[quote=Star_Cards;4214675]

lol.

Just because a network says they are fair and balanced doesn't mean they are. If that sort of thing really worked then I'm super rich and look like brad pitt. :)

i didn't know you were rich! haha, even if they are biased, its still 5-1 in news networks obama-mccain.

[aw00d05]

There is no such thing as a news network that is anywhere close to being unbiased.

A poll that reports on something as abstract as news bias is highly unlikely to be valid. Is it measuring what we think it measures? How logical is it to attempt to quantify or rate someting like bias? I would imagine the data for that is opinion-based, therefore subject to differing interpretations of bias. Subsequently, reliability of the 'ratings' comes into question (to what degree can we say the ratings are true across a broader spectrum). Just because it was done by a 'legit' research group does not mean the poll is legit.

That aside, the video was pretty funny. Obama's campaign should have picked someone with more control to appear. Then again, I'm not a big fan of news anchors trying to act like they know something. I would rather see established people in politics (probably former politicans and the like), who actually know the stuff from an inside perspective, prod the campaigns on tough issues. THAT would be interesting, but it will never happen.

nice perspective, like i said to the next guy about the news biase, even if they are its still 5-1 networks for obama over mccain.