Results 1 to 10 of 11
-
03-09-2003, 09:47 PM #1titan102390Guest
kg vs. webber
who is better kg or webber?
-
-
03-09-2003, 09:48 PM #2titan102390Guest
kg is better he has carried his team on his back and made them a playoff team but webber has vlade, peja, bibby and others
-
03-09-2003, 09:48 PM #3
kg he is just nasty. nice job heller u didn't answer your own thread in 2 different post hah just messin with ya
-
-
03-09-2003, 09:49 PM #4
nevermind i spoke to soon
-
03-10-2003, 06:32 PM #5
yea mike y do u do that???? maybe to get points fast and in a cheap way??? jk ......prob kg he is just nasty like my irish boy said
-
-
03-10-2003, 07:25 PM #6markc45Guest
kq def. but kg has szcerbiak...who is goirish??
-
03-11-2003, 06:09 PM #7
garnett is having a great season and is the heart of that team but the kings are also only a mediocre team without webber and he is a very valuable player (i wish the celts had him...maybe for walker???)
-
-
03-11-2003, 06:16 PM #8bassmasterGuest
Both players are studs and I'm not saying one is better than the other. I do think Webber is the better passer but KG makes up for it in other ways.
-
03-13-2003, 03:52 PM #9markc45Guest
i think kg is better b.c he has a pretty good shot and he can be a big man at the same time
-
03-17-2003, 04:31 PM #10
KG no question. Besides wally he has no help and almost averages a triple-double every night. Webber gets garbage points from people defending Bibby, Peja and Bobby Jackson.
-
