Official Los Angeles Lakers Thread

[ugi802004]

Ok maybe u have likd them for your whole 17 years, and ive liked the lakers my whole 15 years. So how u gunna come say im a front runner. And dude if the Lakers were healthy they would have 70 wins the year.....yea no ifs and or buts, they would, they are like 12-2 w/ whole starting lineup (including fox). So too bad T-wovles havent even been in the NBA for 17 years. lol, so how are you a wolves fan for that long. And u can watch your 3 susperstars cry once they make it outta the 1st round, they are having a great year, theyll get outta 1st round, but never outta the 2nd.

[podstock]

4/11/04: Kings dominate the Lakers

no score needed

well, the officials decided to call it tight; Shaq got 2 quick fouls before you could blink, and the Lakers got crushed 31-16 in the 1st quarter, and were down 19 points in the 1st half

and Kobe too ONE stinking shot in the 1st half

GAME OVER

now, normally, I'd be steaming mad!!

but you know what?

most likely, the Kings, if they win their final 2 games or the Lakers lose one of their last 2 games, will get the #2 seed.

Lakers are 1 game behind Spurs for the #3 seed.

Now, if Minnesota and Spurs win out...the seedings are as follows:

MN #1
SAc #2
Spurs #3
Lakers #4

now, do you see why I am not mad that the Lakers lost?
Once they beat MN (and Wolf gives me his 50 cc, lol), all they have to do is beat the winner of Sac vs. SA

On the other hand....Sac and Spurs play each other, THEN they have to go through the Lakers to get to the NBA Finals

So, I am calm, cool, and collected.

Otherwise, I'd have beaten the crap out of the Easter bunny!!

[stalking_WOLF_21]

MN #1
SAc #2
Spurs #3
Lakers #4
what does this say huff plmk thanks

[ugi802004]

wow he goes from too many shots to not enough shots, common 18 points between kobe and shaq. This game was sad. And wolf, every year LA wins is when there the 3rd or 4th seed. And id rather be 4th b/c we get grizzle 1st round rather than the Mavs at 6th seed.

[podstock]

Originally posted by stalking_WOLF_21
MN #1
SAc #2
Spurs #3
Lakers #4
what does this say huff plmk thanks

lolol

it doesn't mean a thing

other than that we don't have to beat BOTH SA and Sacramento to get to the NBA Finals

I'd much rather have to beat the Wolves and either the Spurs/Kings

than to have to beat the Spurs in the 2nd round, and move into the West Conference Finals against the Kings

I don't fear the Wolves

by the way, can someone answer this question?

HOW MANY PLAYOFF SERIES HAVE THE TIMBERWOLVES WON?

hehehehe

[insanefishpossay]

Originally posted by ugi802004
And dude if the Lakers were healthy they would have 70 wins the year

And, "dude", you could make the same argument for the wolves. Olowokandi was out for a long time, as were Wally Szczerbiak and Troy Hudson, all were suppose to play major roles this season.

[insanefishpossay]

Originally posted by podstock

I don't fear the Wolves

And the Wolves don't fear the Lakers.

Originally posted by podstock
HOW MANY PLAYOFF SERIES HAVE THE TIMBERWOLVES WON?

None.

But the wolves must be pretty damn good if all you people can do to say they'll lose is bring up the fact that they've had 7 straight first round exits.

[ugi802004]

Your right, they did miss some role players in the season but 1 question. Who is more important being hurt : Kobe, shaq, fox, and malone...... or ........ Wally, hudson, and Olowokandi

[ugi802004]

Originally posted by insanefishpossay


But the wolves must be pretty damn good if all you people can do to say they'll lose is bring up the fact that they've had 7 straight first round exits.

Wait how does that make then "pretty damn good" with 7 staraight 1st round exits. Im not tryin to be mean or anything, im jus wondering how that makes them better.

[ugi802004]

They said shaq was cursing in front of a live camera again, in a live interview. Does anyone know if he is susspended or not?