Results 1 to 10 of 12
-
06-26-2009, 04:09 PM #1
How do you feel about manufactured patches?
I know I personally don't like them too much. What does everyone else think?
-
-
06-26-2009, 04:13 PM #2
I think Your absolute. right... Theres really no point of them..
-
06-26-2009, 04:21 PM #3
I'd rather one that was on a player's jersey than something that says "#1 Draft Pick" or something like that. I just don't see the point of them.
-
-
06-26-2009, 06:05 PM #4
yeah I want an actual name off the back of ther ejerseys tbh
-
06-26-2009, 06:11 PM #5
Some are interesting, but most are not.
-
-
06-26-2009, 08:51 PM #6

There are two and only two kinds I like. 1) REAL lettermen from REAL jerseys that were worn in REAL games. 2) I'm kinda ashamed to admit it, but I like the jumbo team logo patches (Leaf R&S, NT)...they're pretty. Manufactured letters and RC logos or NFL logos...no use for whatsoever.
-
06-27-2009, 02:22 AM #7
I don't realize all the hate on them. I mean, technically, it's just an insert card. I think people are trying to compare them to game used cards instead of what they should be compared to, inserts. In my opinion, if you get a manufactured patch, it's better than a regular insert. If you get a signed one, it's more interesting than a normal auto card.
-
-
06-27-2009, 03:13 AM #8
I strongly dislike them. It's almost mocking the whole game-used idea. And it killed me the first time I was told that Lettermen patches were manufactured.
-
06-27-2009, 03:54 AM #9
Not every letterman is manufactured. I have three letterman cards of the same player that are actually game-used. I just need two more to spell out his name. I have #2/5, #3/5, #4/5. I need #1/5 and #5/5.
-
06-27-2009, 06:26 AM #10
Yes, but they are emulating game used stuff. I agree with Darren, the logos are very cool. And Bowman did that this year too, nice college logos with an auto. Now those and real game used I like. The companies should make more of the logos and fewer of the manufactured patches.
-

















