Results 11 to 20 of 40
-
08-01-2009, 03:28 PM #11
Some of their photo shopped cards don't look that bad, and some look down right awful.
-
-
08-01-2009, 04:05 PM #12
tboculosis
Yeah, but you'd think in this day and age when there is so much competition that they would try harder than that. I mean who makes a decision like that.
"Hey Bob that looks great! Let's go with that!"
BTW...your login..tboculosis. Are you a big Tim Teebo fan? Tampa Bay? Or are you just a fan of Tabasco? Just curious.
-
08-01-2009, 06:07 PM #13
Check out the Cutler card in action in a Bears uniform. His teamate is clearly a Bronco. I'm sure the Denver Orton is photoshopped too but they did a pretty good job on it.
Topps has been doing the airbursh/photoshop thing to change players unis at least since they started making baseball cards in the 50's.
-
-
08-01-2009, 06:35 PM #14
VikingsCC80
..so I'm finding out. Still don't like it. I wonder what the guys who only collect cards with players in their teams uniforms feel about this?
-
08-01-2009, 07:18 PM #15
unbelievable that i never paid attention to this
-
-
08-01-2009, 07:36 PM #16
Oh, no. My screen name is a play off of my nickname "T.BO", which is short for "Tommy Boy" since my name is Tom.
-
08-01-2009, 09:30 PM #17
Don't know what the complaint is about. All companies photoshop the pics. And all companies re-use pics. They even re-use and re-edit photos from previous years for new products.
-
-
08-01-2009, 09:32 PM #18
Topps is spiraling downwards. They didn't even show up at the National!
-
08-01-2009, 09:45 PM #19
So you don't have a problem with a completely fabricated image? Especially one that has to be false?
-
08-01-2009, 09:46 PM #20
Seriously? Unbelievable!
-
Originally Posted by fastwb 
