Results 1 to 10 of 14
-
08-13-2009, 06:52 PM #1
THE CUP 1/1 Shields REDEMPTION????
Did anyone see this auction??? At guy at my LCS pulled this, and trust me he is clueless when it comes to hockey, so does anyone know anything about this so i can try to pass on the info to him. I know there is a TON of HOCKEY EXPERTS on here so any info i can pass on would be AWESOME!! thanks!
-Chris
http://cgi.ebay.com/09-The-Cup-Uncut...d=p3911.c0.m14
-
-
08-13-2009, 07:07 PM #2
Not a chance it will have shields in it. It's an awesome item but it will just be the sheet of cards framed with nothing where the shields will be.
-
08-13-2009, 07:24 PM #3New Project Manager
Yes all sheet come empty. He his assuming that because UD said that both face will be on it that it will hold the sheild.
No No No...
Still a very sweet item to have on a wall, just not worth 20K maybe 2K
-
-
08-13-2009, 09:56 PM #4
hummm... a nice collection item, but item only made of cardboard (no signatures, no memorabilias on the sheet) don't have a lot of popularity. Nice item anyway, whatever its value.
-
08-13-2009, 10:52 PM #5
I tried to tell him there was no shields in it but he didn't want to listen. Still a great pull no doubt.
-
-
08-14-2009, 02:17 AM #6
cool thx all for the info, hopefully he will listen, and yes i thought 20k was a bit EXCESSIVE! LOL!
-
08-14-2009, 04:20 AM #7
As already mentioned no shields or autos but still a great display piece!
-
-
08-14-2009, 07:53 AM #8
I would say about $2k. Even without autos, or shields, those uncut framed sheets look awesome. Th eonly problem is finding someone who wants it badly enough to cough up the dough. For most collectors these don't count as part of a player PC.
-
08-14-2009, 11:54 AM #9
have you ever thought this one is just a marketing strategy for him ?
hes a multi sport seller so he must known that past uncut sheets dont contain memorabilia .
-
08-14-2009, 01:10 PM #10
whatever the marketing strategy for a company or an individual, it is supposed to be honest. So, he's 1) ignorant, or 2) dishonest. I prefer to think he's 1) because we don't like to deal with people in 2).
-
Originally Posted by skeen 
