Results 21 to 30 of 61
-
08-16-2009, 05:08 PM #21
While we are at it. Just about every player drafted for the last 2 years at talent positions and Def. looked really good too
-
-
08-16-2009, 05:08 PM #22
Will the Lions repeat?
-
08-16-2009, 05:13 PM #23
ravens were beastttt and were playing mostly there second and third stringers!!
-
-
08-16-2009, 05:17 PM #24
I'll give ya stuckey, but not smith. I have this thing called work that I do at night so that's why I didn't watch the game. I feel so lucky to have a know-it-all like yourself to fill me in on
everything. btw I saw the one catch stat, that's why I didn't post that one. Smith playing four postions is not relivant at all b/c we aren't talking about any other positions. The fact that he plays at other spots doesn't make him a good WR. Actually when that is the case it's b/c someone doesn't do well at any postion and coaches figure it's good to have them on the roster in case of an urgent need. Anyway the season will tell when it gets here.
Always like a good debate.
Well don't act like you know about something you didn't even see.
Brad Smith was a college QB, were you aware of that?
That's one reason why he plays multiple positions, not because he's "bad" at WR.
And if a guy is playing other positions, well then that's obviously going to take time away from him at WR which equals less stats.
Add that in to being hurt a good part of the year, bouncing between number 3 and 4, and his numbers aren't exactly something to talk about.
Smith isn't a burner, but he's got nice size, is very versatile, and has solid hands.
They each have there pros and cons.
Smith:
Pros- Good size, very versatile, Wildcat option, good hands, possession WR.
Cons- Average speed, injury prone, mental mistakes.
Clowney:
Pros-Excellent speed, can stretch the field well, ideal number 4.
Cons-Small size, poor hands, lack of experience.
I'm not sure where your getting that Smith is so bad, but numbers don't tell the whole story at all.
Clowney's good, but there's a reason he was a late pick and was cut by the Packers.
He's raw, and has alot of work to do, and most if not all of his numbers are agaisnt 2nd and third teamers.
I'm sorry, but Smith is definitely a better WR and all around player then Clowney.
I'm sure the majority would agree with that.
-
08-16-2009, 05:21 PM #25
Clowney could probably be a good kick returner though too.
-
-
08-16-2009, 08:48 PM #26
Finally saw how the Cowboys played, not bad. I'm concerned about Adams as he struggled w/ Elllis.
-
08-23-2009, 11:11 PM #27
I know it was against third teamers aka guys who won't have a job but anybody think Chase McDaniel will be the Skins number 3 maybe a 2 before year is out????
-
-
08-24-2009, 01:26 PM #28
Chase McDaniel?
If you mean Chase Daniel, then IMO, no.
They like Brennan as the development number 3 guy, and Collins as the veteran guy who can start in a pinch.
Daniel may end up on the practice squad, but I think he'd be more successful in a d different league.
-
08-24-2009, 03:04 PM #29
Yea just seems like alot of talent to let hang on a practice squad I know Collins can start in a pinch but he's getting a little up in age cuz ain't this like his 15 year and Jason just seems like a T-Jack player shows flash's of greatness but its just not consistent enuff,
-
08-24-2009, 03:18 PM #30
There not going to keep 3 inexperienced QBs on the active roster.
They can't cut Collins either, unless they plan on eating his contract.
Not to mention Daniel doesn't have the size or arm to be successful in the NFL outside of a West Coast offense.
-
Originally Posted by jprt80 
