Results 11 to 20 of 20
-
10-23-2009, 01:45 PM #11
im not defending newsbusters. I would like to know how posting some comments from users proves anything though.
-
-
10-23-2009, 02:55 PM #12
Nope, the ape-like arms belong to monkeyboymike. He is the one that descended from apes.
My point was that the liberals in this forum love to quote HP as a source of info on almost a daily basis, yet those same liberals have an issue with someone else using a biased source of info.
Whats more, your posting a snapshot of comments made by random, anonymous people as basis for the argument that Newsbusters is not credible. That makes no sense. Comments by random people has nothing to do with the authenticity of the articles on the site.
-
10-23-2009, 03:16 PM #13
The second screenshot helped tie it together, but had to be removed. My point is, the bloggers who write "articles" (blogs), which are used as a "source," also have a forum for idle chit-chat, where they really let loose. If you explore the site a bit, you'll see what I mean. I'd put HP in the same category. If it's your job to find liberal propaganda, conservative racism, or whatever, you're going to find it. More often than not, it has little validity.
If you really want to read unbiased news articles, BBC.com is the way to go. However, if everyone used this as a source, the forum would be dead. Hmmmm... why do you suppose that is?
-
-
10-23-2009, 10:50 PM #14
i'll never understand why it's okay for mods to mock peoples user names, whether its a joke or not, but if i do it, it gets edited within minutes...
not complaining or anything...i could care less...would just like to see some consistency here
-
10-23-2009, 11:00 PM #15
I'd imagine it depends on the mod and the victim.
-
-
10-23-2009, 11:48 PM #16
RedGoneWILD, more like RedGoneMILD, amirite?!?
-
10-23-2009, 11:50 PM #17
If you really want to read unbiased news articles, BBC.com is the way to go. However, if everyone used this as a source, the forum would be dead. Hmmmm... why do you suppose that is?
BBC is one letter away from ABC and NBC so it's librul by association. If they were named FOE or GOX or even newsmusters I could see where they might be unbiased. I'll let others explain.
-
-
10-25-2009, 05:49 PM #18OPG Storefront Manager
Your right Red, there should be some consistency and we are trying to do so.
If there is ever any issue please do not hesitate to PM me
-
10-25-2009, 06:29 PM #19
I think you and Red missed some of the context of that. Its in reference to their dispute about Evolution and Humans coming from Apes. Without that context, it looks much worse than it really is.
-
10-25-2009, 07:02 PM #20OPG Storefront Manager
I did catch that part,thanks for the heads up!
-
Originally Posted by Yanksfan396 
