Statisticians reject global cooling

[dfr52]

I hear what you are saying. Is the debate really about if it is man made or not though? There is alot of skeptics saying that there is no such thing as rising sea levels and temperatures at all. Most of these skeptics are top scientists and professors but their only argument is that these organizations that provide the data doctored them up.

I think it is commonly accepted that from evidence of hundreds of thousands of years proves that when the temperature is up the CO2 and GHG levels are the highest. How this connection operates I'm not sure.

I have agree, and while global warming is still debated I don't think it can be argued that polluting has some sort of a negative impact on the earth.

[drtom2005]

Uh so the list that you provided is a list made by somebody of people that he thinks should have no say becasue they have been paid off.
This is not a nice big list of people who have signed onto the global warming

Ok here is a breakdown for you, all you had to do was look, but seems as though you did nothing of the sort since it is against what you believe in. and you love to bash on people and say that they never read the "info" that you provide.
The following outline gives a more detailed analysis of the signers' educations.
Atmosphere, Earth, & Environment (3,803)

1. Atmosphere (578)

I) Atmospheric Science (113)
II) Climatology (39)
III) Meteorology (341)
IV) Astronomy (59)
V) Astrophysics (26)

2. Earth (2,240)

I) Earth Science (94)
II) Geochemistry (63)
III) Geology (1,684)
IV) Geophysics (341)
V) Geoscience (36)
VI) Hydrology (22)

3. Environment (985)

I) Environmental Engineering (486)
II) Environmental Science (253)
III) Forestry (163)
IV) Oceanography (83)

Computers & Math (935)

1. Computer Science (242) 2. Math (693)

I) Mathematics (581)
II) Statistics (112)

Physics & Aerospace (5,810)

1. Physics (5,223)

I) Physics (2,365)
II) Nuclear Engineering (223)
III) Mechanical Engineering (2,635)

2. Aerospace Engineering (587)

Chemistry (4,818)

1. Chemistry (3,126) 2. Chemical Engineering (1,692)

Biochemistry, Biology, & Agriculture (2,964)

1. Biochemistry (744)

I) Biochemistry (676)
II) Biophysics (68)

2. Biology (1,437)

I) Biology (1,048)
II) Ecology (76)
III) Entomology (59)
IV) Zoology (149)
V) Animal Science (105)

3. Agriculture (783)

I) Agricultural Science (296)
II) Agricultural Engineering (114)
III) Plant Science (292)
IV) Food Science (81)

Medicine (3,046)

1. Medical Science (719) 2. Medicine (2,327)

General Engineering & General Science (10,102)

1. General Engineering (9,833)

I) Engineering (7,280)
II) Electrical Engineering (2,169)
III) Metallurgy (384)

2. General Science (269)

so just in the Atmosphere, Earth, & Environment there are 3,803 signers, I guess you just disqualify all of these.

No I do not. I want to know where their research is and what have they published recently on this specific topic. The site would be better to place all of their articles from the earth scientists and what they are studying. I will now have to go look at their research.

And thank you for being the first person who brought evidence that might change my mind.

[drtom2005]

i know it feels like talking to a wall. That's what happens when you egotistically believe that you are smarter than everyone else you are talking to. Rather than listen to anything anyone says, you approach them with the assumption that you are smarter and they are wrong. There is no proof that you could be given that you wouldn't find a reason to say it is not relevant.
What is your degree in if I may ask? Because you throw out all the names on the list given because their field doesn't make them qualified. And yet, you present yourself as though your opinion matters on every subject related to science. I would like to know your degree so that we only have to listen to you when we talk about that subject.
Just so you don't think I am being biased, my degree is in Christian Ministry. As such, I have never placed myself in a place of expertise in anything except religion related topics.

This is fine. You do not have to listen to me. All I can say you have never given me evidence to change my mind while willy@anker has. All I will say about my degree is that I could sign the global warming deniers petition, but would never do it.

By the way, Enseberg, I have never acted like an expert. I am well-read on the topics that I comment on though. If you come with evidence, I will listen. If you come with general statements on science, I will not.

willy@anker has shut me up on this topic until I read the evidence of the earth science petition signers.

[ensbergcollector]

This is fine. You do not have to listen to me. All I can say you have never given me evidence to change my mind while willy@anker has. All I will say about my degree is that I could sign the global warming deniers petition, but would never do it.

By the way, Enseberg, I have never acted like an expert. I am well-read on the topics that I comment on though. If you come with evidence, I will listen. If you come with general statements on science, I will not.

willy@anker has shut me up on this topic until I read the evidence of the earth science petition signers.

so why won't you tell us what your degree is in? all I can gain from your post is that you have a master degree.

[drtom2005]

I can not because it may cost me money.

[ensbergcollector]

I can not because it may cost me money.

honestly asking, how would telling what kind of doctor you are cost you money? feel free to pm me if you don't want to post here. at this point, it is only about my curiosity!!

[WantToTrade]

hes about as qualified as Dr. Pepper


j/k

[Titantron]

hes about as qualified as Dr. Pepper


j/k

Dr. Dre (ed lover, not nwa). Not that either is qualified.