Results 1 to 10 of 13
-
11-09-2009, 10:00 PM #1
is this Crosby/Malkin dual patch an error????
Alright, need some help with this one. According to Upper Deck and the Artifacts box all Tundra Tandems patches are #'ed to something, regular Tundra Tandems patches are /35, red version is /15, silver version is /5 and gold version is /1. Can't find any info on unnumbered Tundra Tandems patches. Well this Crosby/Malkin is for sure a Tundra Tandems Patches which appears to be the silver version but there's nothing on it indicating any print run at all. From what I can tell there should be a stamp just above malkin's head to the right of the work "Tundra" but there's nothing. So is this an error or is there a Tundra Tandems Patches parallel that has no listed print run??? Here's a scan:
Any help on this one would be great, thanks in advance.
RyanLast edited by Smalls007; 11-15-2009 at 08:30 PM.
-
-
11-09-2009, 10:06 PM #2Hockey Manager
Looks like the stamper missed that one.
Habs fan and collector! Current PC's: Nick Suzuki, Cole Caufield, and Lane Hutson...., and of course...
-
11-10-2009, 10:12 AM #3
Anyone else got any opinions?? Is it possible this one missed it's stamp?
-
-
11-10-2009, 12:44 PM #4
No number? No problem
Yes, I completely agree the stamping machine just missed the card. No question it should have been, I don't think - and luckily it's a pretty easy fix. Send it back to UD and they won't have to replace it, they'll just number it for you. It's happened to me twice. Beautiful card, though!
-
11-10-2009, 01:07 PM #5
who cares the numbering, that card is a KILLER with or without any serial on it. Beautiful card!!!! Congrats!
-
-
11-10-2009, 03:10 PM #6
Awsome card but if it is a /5 I would get it stamped, its amazing how that stamp can drive up value!
-
11-10-2009, 06:26 PM #7
Well, I have talked to Upper Deck and they have confirmed that this is an error. Card should be numbered /5. I asked if I could send it in and get re-stamped and was told that if I sent the card in it would be distroyed and an equal value card would be sent to replace it. They said they could not stamp it because they don't know which number they missed. I then asked if they could give me a seperate COA for the card and they said I would have to send it in, and then the card would be distroyed because it's an error!!!!............... So ya looks like it's an /5, 1/1 lol
-
-
11-10-2009, 08:16 PM #8
That sucks, a lot of people will be turned off because no numbering. I dont see UD's logic.
-
11-10-2009, 08:48 PM #9
I've heard UD say that an un-stamped card is more unique.. lol
That's too bad it isn't stamped, but it's an awesome card
-
11-10-2009, 10:04 PM #10
Red parallels are /5, Im pretty sure that one is /15
-
