Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
03-12-2003, 11:17 PM #1titan102390Guest
better offseason cards vs. skins
both teams have picked up at least 4 guys but who will have the better teams in the 03-04 season?
-
-
03-13-2003, 11:53 AM #2
The skins will have better year because they had more good players before they added more in free agency than the cards
-
04-19-2003, 04:50 PM #3
The Redskins made by far the best offseason moves.
-
-
04-19-2003, 04:58 PM #4
Cardinals haven't done much to add to their talent; Emmitt was brought in to bring in fan attendance.
Redskins should be much better under Spurry's 2nd year.
-
04-19-2003, 05:14 PM #5
The Cardinals lost Plummer and Boston. They aren't going anywhere.
-
-
04-19-2003, 07:43 PM #6
Losing Boston wasn't good. I agree there. But as for Plummer - well, he had his shot, many times over, and it wasn't to be. Best that they let him go and start over with a new QB
-
04-22-2003, 07:10 PM #7
Originally posted by podstock
Losing Boston wasn't good. I agree there. But as for Plummer - well, he had his shot, many times over, and it wasn't to be. Best that they let him go and start over with a new QB
I don't think that it was Plummer's fault. Its the team that sucked around him.
Now he gets his final chance to prove himself in Denver.Selling all my cards here updated as of May------------> Hidden Content
Baseball Autograph and Game Used Only Trade Page: pwaldo.webs.com/
//s123.photobucket.com/albums/o299/pwaldo/
-
