Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Why Panini Why???

  
  1. #1




    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    753
    SCF Rewards
    851
    Country
    See mightykeebs's Items on eBay

    Why Panini Why???

    So you put out a great looking set, Ice Kings from 11-12 Crown Royale, but only have 15/20 in the Auto set.

    This really makes me completely discouraged to even attempt the auto set knowing that there will be cards missing because there are no autos for some of the players.

    Jeff Skinner
    Corey Perry
    Cam Ward
    Gabriel Landeskog
    Gerry Cheevers

    Are not in the Auto set.

    This is the second set in 2 releases that Panini has done this. Stanley Cup Winners in 11-12 Limited is the same thing.


    GGGAAAHHHHHH

  2. #2
    BANNED



    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    503
    Country

    And both times, Perry is on the list on non-signed, which bums me out. Both autos look sweet!

  3. #3
    Hockey Advisor






    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    19,964
    SCF Rewards
    98,815
    Country
    Edmonton Oilers Toronto Blue Jays Hamilton Tiger Cats
    See 30Ranfordfan's Items on eBay COMC Cards For Sale Upper Deck ePack

    If I had to bet - They didn't card the signed cards back, and decided to just pull them from the set, instead of putting out those redemption things that everyone seems to hate so much.

  4. #4




    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,541
    SCF Rewards
    902
    Country
    See havocjlb's Items on eBay

    Agreed, but if the 2 biggest cards in your set are redemptions (RNH and Landeskog Silhouettes), having redemptions for those guys seems like no big deal. At least to me, as those 5 ice kings autos aren't what's driving the product.

    If I had to bet - They didn't card the signed cards back, and decided to just pull them from the set, instead of putting out those redemption things that everyone seems to hate so much.


  5. #5




    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    355
    SCF Rewards
    401
    Country

    I'd rather have an attainable completed set then sitting and waiting for redemptions. I'd say good on Panini for being proactive in the eyes of the collector.

  6. #6
    BANNED



    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    503
    Country

    I know it would've meant eliminating cards, but they should've just taken those inserts out. Why have a 20-card insert set with only 15 of them having autos?

  7. #7
    Hockey Advisor






    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    19,964
    SCF Rewards
    98,815
    Country
    Edmonton Oilers Toronto Blue Jays Hamilton Tiger Cats
    See 30Ranfordfan's Items on eBay COMC Cards For Sale Upper Deck ePack

    I think you answered the question yourself :)

    The Silhouettes are driving the product - so if they don't get them back on time, they have to do redemptions.

    The Ice Kings? Cut down on the number of redemptions by just dropping the cards.

    Agreed, but if the 2 biggest cards in your set are redemptions (RNH and Landeskog Silhouettes), having redemptions for those guys seems like no big deal. At least to me, as those 5 ice kings autos aren't what's driving the product.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Sponsors



Follow SCF on