Obama WINS 2nd Debate!

[JustAlex]

This was bound to happen:

http://news.yahoo.com/sidelines-deba...061946975.html

"Get the transcript," Obama told Romney.

"He did call it an act of terror," Crowley said, siding with Obama's interpretation.

On CNN after the debate, Crowley said her comment "was the natural thing that came out of me."

Romney supporters at the debate were irate.

^SO MUCH FAIL form the GOP!

[habsheaven]

Clear win for Obama. I didn't mind when Romney interrupted Obama, or vise versa. Where I thought Romney bombed was in his treatment of Crowley. He bullied her constantly to try and extend his talking points. That was embarrassing!

[shrewsbury]

if either one of them won, i failed to see it and i would have loved to see a clear winner.

i can be honest and say obama would have to do more to impress me them romney, because i know what oama has done, but both failed and i am still undecided.

[MadMan1978]

So I am reading points for the debate and I have a couple of questions for my Teapublicans -If they would be so kind to answer without deflecting


A Binder full of woman?

Blames Single Parents for gun violence ?

Can you at least explain these at any level and still stay Mitt won ?


and please if you going to deflect or attack then dont bother replying

[mrveggieman]

if either one of them won, i failed to see it and i would have loved to see a clear winner.

i can be honest and say obama would have to do more to impress me them romney, because i know what oama has done, but both failed and i am still undecided.

What can Obama do short of walking on water and turning water into wine that will impress you? Also please keep it real we all know that you have no intention of voting for President Obama and you will vote for Romney under the guise anyone but Obama.

[habsheaven]

if either one of them won, i failed to see it and i would have loved to see a clear winner.

i can be honest and say obama would have to do more to impress me them romney, because i know what oama has done, but both failed and i am still undecided.

From reading what you type on this forum for the last two years about Obama I find it EXTREMELY HARD to believe you are undecided. Romney must be the worst candidate in history to not have garnered your support after everything you have said criticizing Obama. You remind me of all the "undecided" voters they speak to after the debates, except I haven't seen their thoughts for the last two years.

[tpeichel]

This was bound to happen:

http://news.yahoo.com/sidelines-deba...061946975.html

[/B]

^SO MUCH FAIL form the GOP![/FONT][/COLOR]

You're kidding right? The President tries to play it off like he called this a terrorist attack from day one and Romney calls him on it. He totally has Obama on the defensive until the moderator steps in and bails him out, effectively killing the moment, by interjecting herself into the debate to support Obama's bogus premise.

And before you argue that the word was "in the transcript", that was not what he meant which was obvious from the next two weeks when his administration pointed to the youtube video as the cause for the attack.

[pghin08]

So are you saying if Obama acted in that way it would be okay, because Romney is just a governer.

The idea of winning the debate is in my opinion mute. They were positioning themselves to reaffirm their parties, whatever stance you had before the debate will still be true after. I just wished instead of each other beating their past actions/ideas down, they would have taken this national stage to say what specific changes they hope to make in the next 4 years in office. And how they would make them. Point plans with broad ideas is not going to help the people, of course everyone wants to hear tax cuts, lower the deficit and increase jobs. But just saying that a stronger economy will do that is not enough. Whether its a top down or middle out approach, they are selling theories, I wanted to hear ideas.

I have no clue who you are, but I really want you to stick around the P&R forum.

[mrveggieman]

I have no clue who you are, but I really want you to stick around the P&R forum.

+1

[shrewsbury]

madman, i would anser your questions but they are for the teapublicans, which i am not.

habs, this shows i am not partisan based nor religious based when it comes to voting.

obama has done wrong in my eyes, but romney has still yet to show he will do better

unlike many on here, i do not base my vote on party, i prefer to make an educated vote, not ones based on race, political parties, or religion

and yes, he must be bad for me not to vote for him because he is a conservative, i am an equal hater!!!!!!!!!!