Obama WINS 2nd Debate!

[mrveggieman]

madman, i would anser your questions but they are for the teapublicans, which i am not.

habs, this shows i am not partisan based nor religious based when it comes to voting.

obama has done wrong in my eyes, but romney has still yet to show he will do better

unlike many on here, i do not base my vote on party, i prefer to make an educated vote, not ones based on race, political parties, or religion

and yes, he must be bad for me not to vote for him because he is a conservative, i am an equal hater!!!!!!!!!!

If you truley feel that way you may want to consider voting for one of the alternative canidates such as Gary Johnson.

[pghin08]

If you truley feel that way you may want to consider voting for one of the alternative canidates such as Gary Johnson.

I'll tell you what, I'm a PA resident, and Gary Johnson just got on the ballot here. I'm strongly considering voting for him.

[mrveggieman]

I'll tell you what, I'm a PA resident, and Gary Johnson just got on the ballot here. I'm strongly considering voting for him.

On the cool I really like Gary Johnson and like some of his ideas. However he does not have a realistic chance of voting and a vote for him especially in a swing state like PA coming from a more liberal leaning person would be one less vote for President Obama which is akin to a vote for Romney.

[pghin08]

On the cool I really like Gary Johnson and like some of his ideas. However he does not have a realistic chance of voting and a vote for him especially in a swing state like PA coming from a more liberal leaning person would be one less vote for President Obama which is akin to a vote for Romney.

I totally understand, but I hate basing my vote off who has a realistic chance of voting. It's our duty as citizens to cast a vote for who we think is best for the job. Gary Johnson might be the best guy for this job. I'm honestly not sure what I'm going to do yet.

[Theodor Madison]

I also would vote for Johnson, if that would get Mr. O out of office.
As far as the debate, Just because someone has a big smile and speaks well does not make him a winner. I feel he is like his record a loser. I would have liked him to do well, but he just has not.

[mrveggieman]

I totally understand, but I hate basing my vote off who has a realistic chance of voting. It's our duty as citizens to cast a vote for who we think is best for the job. Gary Johnson might be the best guy for this job. I'm honestly not sure what I'm going to do yet.

Agreed with the bolded part but unfortunately since most Americans do not think that we that is why we are limited to the two choices that we have.

[tpeichel]

I also would vote for Johnson, if that would get Mr. O out of office.
As far as the debate, Just because someone has a big smile and speaks well does not make him a winner. I feel he is like his record a loser. I would have liked him to do well, but he just has not.

Yep, he was unable to defend his four year record because it is indefensible. He admitted his foreign [policy failure in Libya but then tried to foist some BS about calling it a terrorist attack from the beginning. He praised Clinton when he should have been demanding a resignation if everything they'd have us believe is true about Libya. His indignation about the opposition making this issue political is laughable because is was so transparently political from the beginning.

On the other hand, Romney revealed that he shares Obama's view that the Constitution is fungible when he touted his "consensus" on gun control in Massachusetts, apparently he believes that unalienable rights are optional as long as legislators agree upon it. He has no real plan for getting the debt under control and is assuming that strong economic growth will generate the additional revenue needed to offset his proposed tax cuts, a dicey situation at best when the issue that caused the initial crash, excessive debt in the system, has not been addressed.

[mrveggieman]

Yep, he was unable to defend his four year record because it is indefensible. He admitted his foreign [policy failure in Libya but then tried to foist some BS about calling it a terrorist attack from the beginning. He praised Clinton when he should have been demanding a resignation if everything they'd have us believe is true about Libya. His indignation about the opposition making this issue political is laughable because is was so transparently political from the beginning.

On the other hand, Romney revealed that he shares Obama's view that the Constitution is fungible when he touted his "consensus" on gun control in Massachusetts, apparently he believes that unalienable rights are optional as long as legislators agree upon it. He has no real plan for getting the debt under control and is assuming that strong economic growth will generate the additional revenue needed to offset his proposed tax cuts, a dicey situation at best when the issue that caused the initial crash, excessive debt in the system, has not been addressed.

Why don't you consider one of the alternative canidates?

[Wickabee]

if either one of them won, i failed to see it and i would have loved to see a clear winner.

i can be honest and say obama would have to do more to impress me them romney, because i know what oama has done, but both failed and i am still undecided.

If you didn't see a winner, you either didn't watch it or can't admit your guy lost. I'm sorry, but that was decisive.

[pghin08]

Yep, he was unable to defend his four year record because it is indefensible. He admitted his foreign [policy failure in Libya but then tried to foist some BS about calling it a terrorist attack from the beginning. He praised Clinton when he should have been demanding a resignation if everything they'd have us believe is true about Libya. His indignation about the opposition making this issue political is laughable because is was so transparently political from the beginning.

On the other hand, Romney revealed that he shares Obama's view that the Constitution is fungible when he touted his "consensus" on gun control in Massachusetts, apparently he believes that unalienable rights are optional as long as legislators agree upon it. He has no real plan for getting the debt under control and is assuming that strong economic growth will generate the additional revenue needed to offset his proposed tax cuts, a dicey situation at best when the issue that caused the initial crash, excessive debt in the system, has not been addressed.

Okay, I would love to hear your explanation on what happened during the crash of 08-09.