Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1




    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    800
    SCF Rewards
    7,136
    Transferred Feedback
    HI (38)
    Country
    See Cantstop17's Items on eBay

    16-17 Parkhurst Variation ?

    Has anyone noticed that the green commons in the 16-17 Parkhurst has a Normal Glossy version and another version that is non glossy with no sheen ,probably 1in10. All of my rookies are of the Glossy type and I was wondering if there are any Rookies from the set out there that are non Glossy?The majority of the cards I purchased were from twin fat packs.
    Al

  2. #2




    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    340
    SCF Rewards
    1,521
    Country
    Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Blue Jays Toronto Raptors
    See darbscard88's Items on eBay Instagram:

    The very first few fat packs I opened were non glossy, including the rookies. I saved all my Leafs and def have some Marners, Matthews and Nylanders that are both glossy and non glossy. Not sure if there is a difference or what. After the first few fat packs, everything else has been glossy.

  3. #3




    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    800
    SCF Rewards
    7,136
    Transferred Feedback
    HI (38)
    Country
    See Cantstop17's Items on eBay

    The very first few fat packs I opened were non glossy, including the rookies. I saved all my Leafs and def have some Marners, Matthews and Nylanders that are both glossy and non glossy. Not sure if there is a difference or what. After the first few fat packs, everything else has been glossy.

    Thanks for letting me know there are non glossy rookies. I had just purchased another pack and all glossy in it .

  4. #4






    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    13,465
    SCF Rewards
    119,913
    Transferred Feedback
    CnC (21)
    Country
    Toronto Maple Leafs NULL NULL
    Twitter: @@creasecollector Instagram: COMC Cards For Sale Upper Deck ePack My traders on Flickr

    So are these a manufacturing/printing error or a parallel version? I remember Score had Glossy / Non-Glossy parallel variations. Either way, nice catch !
    Jhonas Enroth Card Collector & Host of the Hidden Content
    Hidden Content Hidden Content
    View my Hidden Content | My Hidden Content | Complete Hidden Content | Card Blog Hidden Content

  5. #5




    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    800
    SCF Rewards
    7,136
    Transferred Feedback
    HI (38)
    Country
    See Cantstop17's Items on eBay

    So are these a manufacturing/printing error or a parallel version? I remember Score had Glossy / Non-Glossy parallel variations. Either way, nice catch !

    That is what I was wondering ,manufacturing/printing error or parallel version.To a player collector it might mean something,If this is another parallel it may be in the interest of a few collectors especially with YounGuns1988 finding Non Glossy Toronto Rookies.I would like to get Spezza in the non Glossy myself.I have got apx 50 Commons in Non Gloss.Hopefully we can get more feedback from others.

  6. #6




    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    19,305
    SCF Rewards
    2,571
    Blog Entries
    1
    Country
    Buffalo Sabres Colorado Avalanche
    Twitter: @@DGeschwender See metalica7's Items on eBay Upper Deck ePack

    As a player collector, I am not classifying them as separate versions. Just grabbed a copy of the base card, and that's that.

  7. #7




    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    227
    SCF Rewards
    2,322
    Country
    Detroit Red Wings Indianapolis Colts Toronto Blue Jays
    See caseyww86's Items on eBay

    From what I know, the non-glossy is just a whoops.

  8. #8






    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    13,465
    SCF Rewards
    119,913
    Transferred Feedback
    CnC (21)
    Country
    Toronto Maple Leafs NULL NULL
    Twitter: @@creasecollector Instagram: COMC Cards For Sale Upper Deck ePack My traders on Flickr

    From what I know, the non-glossy is just a whoops.

    Yeah, there was no announcement about it so I figured it's just most likely just an error.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Sponsors



Follow SCF on